switzerlandde
What’s up with Momentum?

What’s up with Momentum?

04-02-2021 | Einblicke
Momentum had its ‘shot of momentum’ in 2020. But the ride was a bumpy one, while we also saw large return dispersions between different Momentum approaches. In this article, we examine the drivers behind the strong performance delivered by Momentum, how the factor can at times be exposed to significant style and concentration risks, and why we believe a well-diversified portfolio approach across Momentum signals is prudent to mitigate these risks.
  • Guido  Baltussen
    Guido
    Baltussen
    Lead Portfolio Manager
  • Simon Lansdorp
    Simon
    Lansdorp
    Portfolio Manager
  • Milan Vidojevic
    Milan
    Vidojevic
    Researcher

Speed read

  • Momentum factor performance was strong in 2020
  • However, return dispersion between Momentum strategies was large
  • A well-diversified portfolio approach across Momentum signals helps mitigate style and concentration risks

Momentum was one of the top-performing factors in 2020. Indeed, the MSCI ACWI Momentum Index did not only significantly beat the MSCI ACWI, but it also outperformed most factor indices. It benefited from its material exposure to mega-cap growth stocks, in particular its large allocation to ‘big tech’. To this end, the MSCI ACWI Momentum and MSCI ACWI Growth Indices had material overweight exposures to seven of the ten largest stocks in the MSCI ACWI: namely Apple, Microsoft Corporation, Amazon, Tesla, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Alibaba Group Holding and Tencent.1

‘It was not all smooth sailing as the factor navigated an uneven performance path in 2020’

That said, it was not all smooth sailing as the factor navigated an uneven performance path in 2020. Its ride was punctuated by bumpy occasions during periods of strong reversals characterized by growth stocks retreating. From mid-May until early June, during the first half of September, and – most recently – since 9 November 2020, growth stocks lagged the market, significantly reducing the MSCI ACWI Momentum Index’s year-to-date outperformance during those intervals.

In fact, the most evident indication of a value-growth rotation occurred after the announcement of positive phase III clinical trial results for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine-candidate in November. Given its heavy tilt towards large-cap growth equities and underweight exposure to smaller-cap value stocks, the MSCI ACWI Momentum Index was severely affected by the news and the subsequent rally of the value factor. Despite that, the style capped off the year as one of the top-performing factors in 2020.

Quite interestingly, we also observed large return dispersions between different momentum strategies over the period. The results are illustrated in Figure 1, where the blue bars depict the 2020 portfolio returns of various momentum signals relative to their long-term expectations.2 The chart shows that the price momentum factor had an outstanding year, exceeding not only its own long-term average, but also outperforming all the other momentum signals.

Figure 1 | 2020 and long-term performance of Momentum signals in excess of the market

Source: Robeco, FactSet as at November 2020. Figure shows annualized average returns of portfolios constructed based on price momentum, residual momentum, analyst revisions, residual analyst revisions and news sentiment. The investment universe consists of constituents of the MSCI ACWI augmented with large and liquid constituents of the FTSE World Developed, the S&P Broad Market, and the IFC Investable Emerging Markets Index. Portfolios are constructed by investing in securities ranked in the top 20% of the respective signal and they are rebalanced monthly. Combination portfolio is based on the combined ranked where the signals are equal-weighted. Long-term average returns based on the 1986-2020 sample period (2001-2020 for news sentiment).
The picture, however, is a bit different when viewed from a longer-term perspective. Figure 2 shows the calendar-year returns of price momentum and an equal-weighted combination of momentum signals based on a historical sample. The graph reveals that a combined approach delivers higher average returns, and, importantly, also provides a much smoother ride compared to the traditional price momentum factor. The most notable performance gaps took place around significant momentum peaks (e.g. height of dot-com bubble) and momentum drawdowns (e.g. such as 2009).

Figure 2 | Calendar-year returns of Price Momentum and a combination of five Momentum signals

Source: Robeco, FactSet as at November 2020. Figure shows calendar-year returns of portfolios constructed based on price momentum and a combination of price momentum, residual momentum, analyst revisions, residual analyst revisions and news sentiment. The investment universe consists of constituents of the MSCI ACWI augmented with large and liquid constituents of the FTSE World Developed, the S&P Broad Market, and the IFC Investable Emerging Markets Index. Portfolios are constructed by investing in securities ranked in the top 20% of the respective signal and they are reformed monthly.

Apart from the diversification benefits derived from combining different momentum signals, the risk reduction observed stemmed from avoiding large style bets, that typically accompany traditional price momentum. These bets are, on average, unrewarded, and nearly half of the total volatility associated with traditional price momentum strategies can be attributed to them.3

Portfolio construction parameters are another source of significant return dispersion between different momentum approaches. Most notably is the allocation to mega and large-cap stocks versus smaller-cap counterparts. Several studies show that momentum is stronger in mid- to smaller-cap equities. The efficacy of the factor is reinforced by tilting it towards smaller stocks.4

Momentum can, at times, be exposed to significant style and concentration risks. Its current exposure to large-cap growth stocks that trade at lofty valuations is a good example. We believe that a well-diversified portfolio approach across momentum signals is prudent. It avoids concentrated positions and is less affected by the dynamic tilts that traditional price momentum can adopt to other factors, thereby mitigating those risks.

In our view, combining momentum with other factors has been and continues to be an effective way to improve long-term investment outcomes. Although such choices can result in headwinds at times, we believe that being cognizant of momentum’s properties, and taking them into account when designing a momentum or a multi-factor strategy, leads to better performance in the long term.

1Source: MSCI. Data as of 30 November 2020.
2The long-term historical premiums for the five momentum signals are of similar magnitude. Because the signals are not perfectly correlated, the combination results in a stronger and more robust return than any single measure.
3See amongst others: Blitz, D.C., Huij, J. and Martens, M, 2011, “Residual Momentum”, Journal of Empirical Finance.
4More generally, factor premiums manifest themselves more strongly in the mid- and small-cap segments of the market. We discuss these insights in our paper: Blitz, D.C., Lansdorp, S., Roscovan, V. and Vidojevic, M., 2019 “Factor strategies need breadth”, Robeco article. Available upon request.

Logo

Zugangsbeschränkung / Haftungsausschluss

Die auf diesen Seiten enthaltenen Informationen dienen Marketingzwecken und sind ausschliesslich für (i) qualifizierte Anleger gemäss dem Schweizer Bundesgesetz über die kollektiven Kapitalanlagen vom 23. Juni 2006 („KAG“), (ii) Professionelle Kunden gemäss Anhang II der Richtlinie über Märkte für Finanzinstrumente (2014/65/EU; „MiFID II“) mit Sitz in der Europäischen Union oder im Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum mit einer entsprechenden Lizenz zur Erbringung von Vertriebs- / Angebotshandlungen im Zusammenhang mit Finanzinstrumenten oder für (iii) solche, die hiermit aus eigener Initiative entsprechende Informationen zu spezifischen Finanzinstrumenten erfragen und als professionelle Kunden qualifizieren.

Die Fonds haben ihren Sitz in Luxemburg oder den Niederlanden. Die ACOLIN Fund Services AG, Postanschrift: Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zürich, agiert als Schweizer Vertreter der Fonds. UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zürich, Postanschrift: Europastrasse 2, P.O. Box, CH-8152 Opfikon, fungiert als Schweizer Zahlstelle. Der Prospekt, die Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), die Satzung, die Jahres- und Halbjahresberichte der Fonds sind auf einfache Anfrage hin und kostenlos im beim Schweizer Vertreter ACOLIN Fund Services AG erhältlich. Die Prospekte sind auch über die Website www.robeco.ch verfügbar.

Einige Fonds, über die Informationen auf dieser Website angezeigt werden, fallen möglicherweise nicht in den Geltungsbereich des KAG und müssen daher nicht über eine entsprechende Genehmigung durch die Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht FINMA verfügen. Einige Fonds sind in Ihrem Wohnsitz- / Sitzstaat möglicherweise nicht verfügbar. Bitte überprüfen Sie den Registrierungsstatus in Ihrem jeweiligen Wohnsitz- / Sitzstaat. Um die in Ihrem Land registrierten Produkte anzuzeigen, gehen Sie bitte zur jeweiligen Länderauswahl, die auf dieser Website zu finden ist, und wählen Sie Ihr Wohnsitz- / Sitzstaat aus.

Weder Informationen noch Meinungen auf dieser Website stellen eine Aufforderung, ein Angebot oder eine Empfehlung zum Kauf, Verkauf oder einer anderweitigen Verfügung eines Finanzinstrumentes dar. Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite stellen keine Anlageberatung oder anderweitige Dienstleistung der Robeco Switzerland Ltd dar. Eine Investition in ein Produkt von Robeco Switzerland Ltd sollte erst erfolgen, nachdem die entsprechenden rechtlichen Dokumente wie Verwaltungsvorschriften, Prospekt, Jahres- und Halbjahresberichte konsultiert wurden.

Durch Klicken auf "Ich stimme zu" bestätigen Sie, dass Sie resp. die von Ihnen vertretene juristische Person eine der oben genannten Kategorien von Adressaten fallen und dass Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen für diese Website gelesen, verstanden und akzeptiert haben.

Nicht Zustimmen