Head of Next Gen Research
• Insight
From AI copilots to operating models in asset management
Agentic AI in asset management | Workflows
Agentic AI will change what investment professionals can do with AI, but also where AI sits in the asset management operating model.
Authors
Top keywords
Summary
The first wave of generative AI was largely about individual productivity. AI could help a person draft, summarize, search, code or prepare a meeting note. These uses are valuable, but they usually remain task-based: one user, one prompt, one output.
Agentic AI points to a broader shift. Once AI can support a sequence of steps, use tools, preserve context and hand structured outputs to a person or another system, the relevant question changes from ‘Can this tool help me work faster?’ to ‘What workflow is this system part of, what is it allowed to do, and how is the output reviewed?’
That distinction matters in asset management because investment decisions rarely happen in isolation. They sit within a wider chain of work: research preparation, portfolio monitoring, risk review, client reporting, due diligence, compliance checks, data quality, operations and documentation. AI can support many of these steps, but only if the process around it is designed deliberately.
Figure 1 | Agentic AI and workflows – when the operating model changes
Source: Robeco, August 2026.
Moving from copilot to operating model is therefore a question of capability, scale and control. A single AI assistant can be useful even if the process around it is informal. But once AI is embedded into repeatable workflows, asset managers need to think about consistency, cost visibility, operational logging, escalation paths and human sign-off.
From copilot to operating model
The infographic below shows this shift in three stages.
Figure 2 | How workflow evolves with agentic AI
Source: Robeco, August 2026.
From experimentation to investment discipline
Note that not every process should become agentic, but rather that AI-supported workflows need to earn the right to scale. That means knowing what the system is allowed to do, what data it can access, what it costs to run, how often it fails, when it retries, what evidence it uses and when it escalates to a human. It also means maintaining workflow inventories: named owners, approved data sources, approved tools, lifecycle stage, review cadence and escalation paths.
This is where the workflow discussion connects directly to governance. Grounding, stability, permissioning, evidence trails and human oversight are not separate from the operating model.1 They are what allow AI-supported workflows to move from experimentation to institutional use.
In that sense, workflow design becomes part of investment discipline. The firms that benefit most from agentic AI may not be those that automate the fastest, but those that build processes that are repeatable, reviewable, cost-aware and accountable. Indeed, rather than simply using AI more, the next step is to design better workflows around it.
Footnote
1 See Mike Chen’s ‘Agentic AI and governance’ insight
AI investing: Back to school
Agentic AI in asset management
Asset managers are moving beyond generative AI tools toward agentic AI systems that can support workflows, monitor tasks and assist with defined actions.
Important information
THIS WEBSITE IS SOLELY INTENDED FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS, WHICH HAS THE MEANING ASCRIBED TO IT IN THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) AND ITS SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION. Investment involves risks. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The information contained in this website is provided for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell in any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. Investors should not base their investment decisions solely on the information provided on this website and are advised to seek independent advice (including advice on tax implications) before making any investment decisions. Investors should ensure they fully understand the risks associated with the investment products and should also consider their own investment objectives and risk tolerance level. The investment decision is yours. You should not invest unless the intermediary who sells you the investment products has advised you that it is suitable for you and has explained how it is consistent with your investment objectives. Please refer to the relevant offering documents or other legal documents for further details including the risk factors. This website is published by Robeco Hong Kong Limited which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) (CE No. APU851). This website has not been reviewed by the SFC. No assurance can be given that the investment objective of any investment products will be achieved. No representation or promise as to the performance of any investment products or the return on an investment is made. The value of investments may fluctuate. Past performance, projections, or forecasts included in this website should not be regarded as guarantees or indications of future performance, and no express or implied warranty is provided. The contents of this website are based on sources believed to be reliable, but due to the nature of information delivery technology and the necessity of using multiple data sources, including third party content, their accuracy is not guaranteed. The opinions expressed are as of the date shown above and may change as market conditions evolve, and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Robeco investment professionals. Robeco accepts no liability for any direct, indirect, or consequential loss arising from the use of this material or any comments, opinions, or estimates contained herein. Robeco has no duty to update this website or any website content. Materials on this website may not be reproduced, distributed, or published without prior written permission from Robeco. Unless otherwise specified, Source: Robeco.
