High yield indices don’t make good benchmarks

High yield indices don’t make good benchmarks

26-01-2021 | Einblicke
Certain features that are typical of high yield corporate bonds impose costs on high yield portfolios. These costs are not reflected in high yield indices, which means that portfolio managers are put at a disadvantage and that returns of passive high yield funds are structurally lower than the index.
  • Patrick  Houweling
    Co-Head of Quant Fixed Income
  • Sander  Bus
    Co-head Credit team
  • Robbert-Jan 't Hoen
    't Hoen

Speed read

  • High yield portfolio managers face costs not reflected in the index return
  • A high yield index therefore does not make a good benchmark
  • Instead, high yield funds should be compared with one another
How is it possible that so few active high yield managers outperform their index, and that passive managers lag theirs by more than their management fee? Our research shows that a high yield index is not a useful benchmark for evaluating portfolio returns, and that an alternative approach is needed.
Erhalten Sie regelmäßig die Robeco e-News
Erhalten Sie regelmäßig die Robeco e-News

High yields come at a cost

High yield corporate bonds offer several attractive investment features, such as coupon rates and returns that are higher than that of investment grade assets. This comes at a cost, of course. This sector of the credit market also presents challenges for investors, such as limited liquidity, defaults, rating migrations and bonds that are callable before maturity. These characteristics imply a variety of costs that are not reflected in the index returns. The underperformance of passively managed ETFs, for instance, illustrates the difficulties of generating index-like returns in the high yield market.

As long as indices do not contain all the costs that accrue in practice, high yield indices are not a fair reflection of the potential returns from a high yield credit portfolio. This means that they are not suitable as benchmarks for evaluating fund manager performance.

What would be a better performance yardstick?

A different take on relative performance

Our recommendation for investors in high yield funds is to compare portfolio performances with one another, rather than with an index.

For managers who use the same index, a solution would be to compare performance amongst the managers. Where different indices are used, a solution could be to determine the relative performance of each manager – relative to the specific index used – and then to compare the outperformance amongst managers.

Our recommendation for investors in high yield funds is to compare portfolio performances with one another, rather than with an index

It is quite possible in this context that outperformance will be mainly negative for both active and passive managers. As our research shows, this does not automatically mean that all managers have performed badly, but it does make a clear statement about the use of indices as benchmarks.



Ich bestätige ein professioneller Kunde zu sein.

Die Informationen auf der nachfolgenden Website der Robeco Deutschland, Zweigniederlassung der Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V., richten sich ausschließlich an professionelle Kunden im Sinne von § 67 Abs. 2 (WpHG) wie beispielsweise Versicherungen, Banken und Sparkassen. Die auf dieser Website dargestellten Informationen sind NICHT für Privatanleger bestimmt und entsprechen nicht den für Privatanleger maßgeblichen gesetzlichen Bestimmungen.

Wenn Sie kein professioneller Kunde sind, werden Sie auf die Privatkundenseite weitergeleitet.

Nicht Zustimmen