australiaen
Lower earnings may not usher in a bear market

Lower earnings may not usher in a bear market

06-12-2019 | Monthly outlook
Falling company profits don’t necessarily mean a bear market or recession is due, says strategist Peter van der Welle.
  • Peter van der Welle
    Peter
    van der Welle
    Strategist Global Macro team, Robeco

Speed read

  • Earnings per share growth has not kept up with equity values
  • Markets expect reflationary forces to prop up 2020 earnings
  • Recessionary and non-recessionary downtrends are different

Earnings have been on a downtrend since the global economic expansion lost momentum in the second half of 2018. To date, the trailing earnings per share (EPS) growth of the S&P 500 Index has shrunk to a meager 1.6% year on year, while on the MSCI AC World Index, it has actually fallen by 0.6%. Meanwhile, global equities have risen by a whopping 17.6% in the 12 months to the end of November.

“Clearly, we have been experiencing a ‘zero earnings growth’ bull run lately,” says Van der Welle, a strategist with Robeco’s Global Macro multi-asset team. “It begs the question whether the apparent blissful ignorance of the peak in earnings in the rearview mirror matters at all for an aging bull market going forward.”

“Currently, we are in the decelerating segment of the US corporate profitability cycle, as US corporate tax cuts benefits have faded, while unit labor costs have risen. Profit margins are still at decent levels, but the consistent downtrend bears striking similarities with the late-cycle behavior that has preceded previous US recessions.”

Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

A non-recessionary earnings slowdown

Van der Welle says it is important to look at the peaks and troughs in trailing earnings growth – the profits reported over a past period – and compare them with projections for forward earnings growth to get a better idea of what might happen next. US trailing EPS growth peaked in Q4 2018 against a backdrop of escalating trade tensions between the US and China, but may not yet have troughed.

“Financial markets are forward looking and typically anticipate the next phase in the business cycle,” he says. “Major market movements often precede major inflection points in the cycle. Therefore, with hindsight, one may observe that the market rout which erupted in early Q4 2018 was already instigated by the anticipated peak in S&P 500 earnings and the expectation of an overall subsequent earnings growth deceleration taking shape in 2019.”

“However, in waiting for reflationary forces such as more fiscal and monetary stimulus to appear further down the road, this market has defied the downtrend in earnings during 2019.” This is shown in the chart below, with the weighted trailing EPS of the S&P 500 clearly falling while the index itself keeps on rising.

Defying gravity? S&P 500 company earnings have been falling while share prices have been rising.

It can’t last indefinitely

“The question is how long a bull market can withstand such a downtrend in the earnings environment, and the answer is not indefinitely,” says Van der Welle. “Our analysis of the last ten major peak-to-trough moves in the S&P 500 12-month forward earnings figures shows that equity market returns were negative on average (-0.6%) 12 months after a peak in forward earnings.”

“However, not every earnings downtrend is created equal with respect to its equity market impact. There is a distinction to be made between a recessionary and a non-recessionary earnings downtrend.”

“For example, the recessions that occurred from October 2000, November 2007 and June 2008 all coincided with deepening market sell-offs. But the other peak-to-trough forward earnings trajectories (in 1995, 1998, 2002, 2014, 2015 and 2018) all saw equity markets move higher instead.” This is shown in the chart below.

Peaks in forward earnings don’t always mean markets fall afterwards; in many instances, they rose instead.

Reflation likely in 2020

So, what does this mean for markets? “Our base case is that we are likely to see reflation in 2020, and are therefore currently experiencing the non-recessionary earnings slowdown variant,” says Van der Welle.

“Our US yield curve-based recession indicator points to a 30% probability of a US recession in 2020, leaving us positive on equities. With a 70% implied probability of an extension of the cycle, the odds favor equity markets making new highs.”

“In summary, the current environment of declining corporate profitability may not necessarily usher in a bear market. But tactical caution is needed, even if we are seeing the cycle extended, and waiting for reflation keeps paying dividends.”

Earnings delivery is key

Van der Welle says the direction that earnings are about to take as markets head into 2020 is key, as late-cycle bull markets will hinge on earnings delivery.

“This is especially true for the current late-cycle market, since the space available for conventional monetary policy to prop up risky assets is rather limited from a historical perspective,” he says.

“Markets can only stay irrational, or without policy support, for so long. Analysts already expect S&P 500 earnings to trough in Q1 2020 and to improve as the year progresses. This could be on the optimistic side, as reflation and the bottoming out in earnings could take longer to unfold in 2020 than consensus expects – as it did back in 2016.”

Hypothesis is tested

“While we stick to our reflation base case for 2020, the early 2020 reflation hypothesis is being put to the test in our view. A couple of factors have somewhat reduced the odds of an early 2020 reflation. The further weakening of the November ISM manufacturing producer confidence index to 48.1 – a number released prior to US President Trump’s warnings about a potential postponement of the trade deal – shows that spillover risks to the services sector have not vanished either.”

Subsequently, the Robeco Global Macro multi-assets team has been taking some risk off the table. “We have reduced our equity exposure in recent weeks, as the upside for tactically taking equity risk has diminished in our view,” Van der Welle says. “This has left us with a marginally overweight position in global equities and an underweight in global high yield bonds.”

Subjects related to this article are:
Logo

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree