australiaen
Robeco’s Blitz wins award for low volatility article

Robeco’s Blitz wins award for low volatility article

04-09-2019 | Insight
Robeco’s Head of Quant Research has won a prestigious award for an article on hedge funds and the low volatility anomaly.
  • David Blitz
    David
    Blitz
    Head of Quantitative Research

Speed read

  • Article on low-volatility trades is named as ‘best paper of 2018’ 
  • Story analyzes whether hedge funds exploit low volatility
  • Beats over 300 articles for prestigious Bernstein award

David Blitz was named winner of the Peter L. Bernstein Award for his research paper in the summer 2018 edition of The Journal of Alternative Investments entitled ‘Are hedge funds on the other side of the low volatility trade?’ The award is for the “best paper published in 2018” drawn from more than 300 articles published across about a dozen journals in the ‘Portfolio Management Research’ series.

The 4,200-word piece assesses the degree to which hedge funds attempt to exploit the low-volatility anomaly, in which low risk stocks tend to have returns that are too high. Robeco offers investors access to low risk stocks through its range of Conservative Equities funds.

Blitz noted that various practical constraints might prevent many investors from being able to exploit the anomaly, but that hedge funds generally should be able to do so, given their higher sophistication and flexibility. However, Blitz found that rather than benefiting from the anomaly, hedge funds overall tended to bet against it.

Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

Hedge fund performance

He concluded that by favoring high volatility stocks to their low volatility counterparts, this may be a key factor for explaining the overall performance of hedge funds, which had been poor in many instances in the run-up to when the article was published.

The journal’s award is made in honor of Peter Bernstein, an American economist whose work on the efficient-market hypothesis made him a world expert on investment economics and one of the pioneers of quant investing.

The winning article was chosen through a blind review process by an independent committee that comprised Gary Gastineau of ETF Consultants, William Goetzmann of the Yale School of Management, and Ronald Kahn of BlackRock.

“This paper impressed me along dimensions that Peter Bernstein would have appreciated,” says Kahn. “Hedge funds don’t face the usual investor constraints. It’s very surprising then that the low volatility anomaly – which we believe arises due to those constraints – negatively and significantly contributes to their aggregate performance.”

Public recognition

“This is a nice public recognition for the quality of our quantitative research,” says Blitz. “I use this paper a lot in presentations to clients, and have noticed that it is very well received. We always get the question who is on the other side of the low volatility trade, and now we can answer: over three trillion dollars of hedge fund assets!”

He jokingly adds: “When I received a mail with the subject line ‘you have won a prize’ my finger already veered towards the delete button, because it smelled like spam. As it turned out, however, this time I really did win something!”

Blitz won a prize of USD 5,000, which has been donated to the Robeco Foundation.

To read the full article, leave your details on the form below

Disclaimer:

I agree to the Robeco Disclaimer and the collection and use of my personal data by Robeco, for the purposes for which such data is collected and used as set out in the Privacy Policy, including for the purpose of direct marketing of Robeco products or services. Your data will be treated with utmost care and will not be passed on to third parties.

Logo

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree