Diverging fortunes for low-risk stocks as EM and DM decouple

Diverging fortunes for low-risk stocks as EM and DM decouple

23-10-2018 | Insight

So far, 2018 has been marked by a clear decoupling of emerging and developed equity markets. This has led to a divergence in the performance of our low volatility strategies across the world.

  • Jan Sytze  Mosselaar
    Jan Sytze
    CFA, Director, Portfolio Manager

Speed read

  • US stocks keep pushing developed markets up
  • Sentiment has deteriorated in emerging markets
  • Low-risk stocks outperform in EM, but lag in DM

Developed and emerging markets appear to have taken different routes in 2018. While developed markets (DM) have experienced a continuation of the uptrend seen in previous years, mainly driven by the strong performance of US stocks, emerging markets (EM) have been through a rough patch. Sentiment has especially deteriorated in countries like Brazil, South Africa, Turkey and China. Unsurprisingly, low-risk and high-dividend investment styles have worked relatively well in these markets.

The different trajectories of EM and DM stocks are reflected in the performance of different factors in both regions, as shown is Figure 1. Low volatility, the main factor in the bottom-up selection process of Robeco’s Conservative Equities strategies, illustrates this very clearly. Since the low volatility factor helps reduce losses, its contribution to performance has been negative in DM and positive in EM. The significant outperformance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index relative to its DM counterpart also shows how low-risk stocks have done much better in EM than in DM, relative to the market index.

Figure 1 | Market and absolute factor performance 2018 YTD

Source: Bloomberg, Robeco, MSCI. Returns of the MSCI Index, MSCI Minimum Volatility (‘low volatility’), MSCI Value-weighted, MSCI Momentum and MSCI High Dividend, for MSCI World and MSCI EM, net returns in USD.

This is fully in line with our expectations, given the higher volatility in emerging markets this year. It should also be noted that while it did not support performance in the US, the low volatility factor had a positive impact in more troubled developed markets such as Europe and Japan.

A similar observation can be made for the value and momentum factors. This is important as value and momentum characteristics are also taken into account in the stock selection process of our Conservative Equities strategies, although low volatility remains the main driver.

Momentum falters in EM

Momentum stocks are the most telling example. The momentum factor, which has delivered a stellar performance in both developed and emerging markets over the last few years, has continued to do well in developed markets, but not in emerging markets. This is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 | Momentum’s YTD relative performance

Source: Bloomberg, Robeco, MSCI. Chart shows the relative performance of the MSCI Momentum Index versus the MSCI World and MSCI in EM, based on total net returns, all in USD.

This performance gap is also in line with our expectations, as several trends in emerging markets have reversed in 2018. The most notable have been the changing fortunes of Chinese stocks, as the rise of index heavyweights Alibaba and Tencent (which together currently account for 25% of the MSCI China) has faltered this year.

The divergence in performance across factors and regions has been clearly visible in the relative returns of our Conservative Equities strategies this year. As low volatility and high dividend stocks have performed well in emerging markets, Robeco’s EM Conservative Equities strategy has shown clear added value compared to the volatile MSCI EM Index. Meanwhile, as the value factor and in particular the high dividend style clearly haven’t paid off in DM, Robeco’s DM Conservative Equities strategy has lagged the market index.

Although defensive and high dividend strategies have lagged the market in the US this year, it is reasonable to expect that these investment styles will do relatively well when volatility rises again. The recent volatility seen in emerging markets and the subsequent relative factor performance might be a sign of more turbulent times ahead. And the relatively high valuation multiples seen in the US equity market should also be considered a warning sign. In a previous paper1, we showed that high valuation levels are historically associated with higher risk levels going forward.

1 P. van Vliet, 2018, ‘Risky CAPE Repair the roof when the sun is shining’, Robeco article.

EM/DM decoupling results in factor performance divergence in 2018
Read the related note
Subjects related to this article are:



What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree