australiaen
Will it be BRINO – Brexit In Name Only?

Will it be BRINO – Brexit In Name Only?

08-06-2018 | Insight

The UK is likely to end up with a Brexit In Name Only (BRINO) when it ‘leaves’ the European Union, says Robeco Chief Economist Léon Cornelissen.

  • Léon  Cornelissen
    Léon
    Cornelissen
    Chief Economist

Speed read

  • UK government continues to bicker over Brexit terms
  • One solution is to remain half-in and half-out of the EU
  • Parallels with how Norway stays in the Single Market

In a new white paper, he forecasts a Norwegian-style half-in, half-out solution as being the only one currently possible given the limited timeframe available to make a deal. The time needed to solve the complex issue of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland makes it the only workable option of the models available, Cornelissen says.

This would mean the UK exiting the EU as planned on 29 March 2019, but remaining within the Single Market and its tariff-free Customs Union for a transition period of at least two years, and most likely longer. UK Prime Minister Theresa May has already suggested that this would be the most workable option in the short term, though she faces daily rebellions over it from her own Conservative Party MPs, some of whom want a complete exit.

Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

A vassal state?

“Two years after the June 2016 referendum result that shocked the world, the UK is still struggling to agree terms that will secure its divorce after a troubled 45-year marriage,” Cornelissen says in an updated white paper discussing the options available.

“Leaving the European Union is proving to be the most difficult thing that the UK has done in peacetime, as the Conservative Party continues to bicker over what it really wants. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking, with less than a year remaining to reach some sort of settlement before the UK legally exits in March 2019.”

“That would make it a kind of vassal state of the EU, but is that such a bad thing? The UK would essentially be following the Norwegian trading model, and few doubt that Norway has proven to be a successful and wealthy country by adopting this more conciliatory half-in, half-out approach.”

Soft or hard-boiled?

What will eventually prevail as the negotiations stumble on remains hard to predict, Cornelissen says. The main problem is that the referendum result simply called for Britain to leave; it did not say how, or on what terms. At the heart of the issue is whether the UK should pursue a ‘soft Brexit’, in which it remains in the Single Market, or a ‘hard Brexit’, in which it leaves the bloc entirely. Both are problematic.

“A soft Brexit would be the solution that is the most economically beneficial to the UK and solves a whole host of issues, including the complex Irish border problem (where Northern Ireland leaves the EU but the Republic stays in it), since the Single Market would remain in place,” he says.

“However, it would mean the UK must continue to accept the free movement of people and also contribute to the EU budget. This would not solve two political problems that lay at the heart of the Leave campaign – immigration levels that were perceived as being too high, and the notion that Britain is being ruled by Brussels.”

The Long Good Friday

“A hard Brexit does not though solve all political problems either. It would mean a hard border with customs checkpoints on the Irish border, which contravenes the 1998 Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland after decades of the Troubles. It is also seen as being economically disastrous, since the UK would be leaving the largest trading bloc in the world, losing frictionless access to a market of more than 500 million people.” 

“And it raises the question over what future trading model the UK would then pursue, since none are without some sort of problem. All the others being considered, from trying to negotiate a Canadian style arrangement to crashing out of the EU completely and resorting to World Trade Organization terms with lots of tariffs, are not as good as a BRINO. Which by the way is of course still inferior to EU membership.”

Cornelissen says it all begs the question of whether Brexit can be canceled, particularly in light of growing opposition to it within the ‘Remain’ camp in the UK. However, both major political parties in the UK are committed to it, public opinion has not changed that much, and even a referendum to approve the final deal would be legally fraught with problems.

So… will it be BRINO, WTO or Don’t Know? The full white paper can be ordered here.

Leave your details and download the report.

Disclaimer:

I agree to the Robeco Disclaimer and the collection and use of my personal data by Robeco, for the purposes for which such data is collected and used as set out in the Privacy Policy, including for the purpose of direct marketing of Robeco products or services. Your data will be treated with utmost care and will not be passed on to third parties.

Subjects related to this article are:

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree