australieen
‘Culture is a crucial factor in quant investing’

‘Culture is a crucial factor in quant investing’

13-12-2016 | Interview

Quant investing is becoming more widely accepted. But such developments are always accompanied by growing pains. We talked to Pim van Vliet, head of Conservative Equities, about the opportunities and pitfalls and why culture and philosophy are so important.

  • Pim  van Vliet, PhD
    Pim
    van Vliet, PhD
    Head of Conservative Equities and Quant Allocation

Has quant investing finally reached maturity?

“I think we can safely say that quant investing is now on the brink of adulthood. In addition to active funds, consultants are also starting to rate quant products. But there is still a lot of naivety about. The current enthusiasm for quantitative factor investing could evaporate overnight if something goes wrong. These are signs that the market is not yet fully mature. There are, for example, quant products still being sold on the basis of the flimsiest backtests, while investors forget that there is a big difference between ‘paper performance’ and real ‘dollar performance’.”

“If the people who offer quant products and those who buy them are not sufficiently critical, problems can arise. Every asset management company that wants to grow is now betting on quant. But there is more to it than just recruiting a couple of rocket scientists and putting a backtest in the market. A real-life track record and a solid reputation will become increasingly important in the years to come as the demand for quant products increases and the market grows.”

Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

So is there more to it than robust and proven models? How important is it to have the right people and philosophy?

“It’s crucial. In the future, people will focus more and more on the culture and philosophy that characterize the asset manager. The philosophy behind the strategies – pursued by the people behind the models – is what makes the difference. Of course every quant-driven product has an appealing backtest, but without the right culture, paper profits remain just that. Our quantitative investment philosophy is supported by three pillars: a strategy is evidence-based, prudent and based on economic principles. The first is pretty obvious, and even though our database goes back 90 years, which is further than most, it’s the second and third pillars that set us apart from the rest.”

“The biggest risk for quants is data mining – overfitting models as a result of limited data. In our experience the most ‘fitted’ and complex models often have the worst performance in practice. Implementation and execution are hugely important. Every asset manager or index provider can knock up a factor product. But those parties that lead the field in quant, have more experienced people who have already been through different cycles, including challenging years like 1999, 2007 and 2009.”

“Now the market is growing quickly there’s a lot of chaff amongst the wheat. It is more important for clients to be able to assess the differences between various parties. This is why it is a good thing that independent consultants now also look at quant seriously. Investors must maintain a healthy dose of skepticism and not let themselves be dazzled by a good story. In order to evaluate a product (and its seller) on its merits, you need to look at their performance over a complete cycle. Now there are only a few quant funds that have a ten-year track record. And almost all the smart beta indices are even more recent and therefore not fully proven.”

Is Quant investing at Robeco less ‘quant’ than we might be inclined to think it is?

“Quant is not a machine that you plug data into and where returns come rolling out if you turn the handle. It is a ‘people thing’. You won’t achieve success by simply attractively packaging an algorithm and selling that. Robeco's quantitative factor investing is closer to fundamental investing than people tend to think. Yes, we are highly systematic in our work, but at the same time we also try to incorporate the strengths of fundamental investing: know your portfolio, keep it simple, put yourself in the client's shoes, don't trade too much.”

‘Quant is not a machine you plug data into and where returns come rolling out’

“There is an increasing awareness that, as is also the case with fundamental funds, there is a great deal of diversity in quant. There are CTAs and high-frequency quant funds, but also defensive products with low turnover. The Conservative Equities range is our quant label, but the philosophy and turnover of these funds are more similar to, for example, other Robeco equity funds, than the products offered by other quant investors.”

What role can quant fulfill in a portfolio?

“Conservative Equities is all about stable returns and a high dividend. That is clear enough for many investors; we don't need to get into the mechanics of it. They can include this strategy as an alternative to a high-dividend fund. One important distinction between us and other income products is the proven reduction in the level of risk. This strategy also enables you to achieve a more stable coverage ratio, and is also an appropriate addition to a life-cycle mix. In traditional life-cycle funds you start off with a high weight in equities that is gradually reduced over time in favor of bonds. Conservative Equities enables you to maintain a position in equities for longer.”

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree