australieen
Robeco retains PRI’s highest A+ grade

Robeco retains PRI’s highest A+ grade

08-08-2016 | Insight

Robeco has retained the highest possible A+ score for sustainability investing by the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI).

  • Masja Zandbergen
    Masja
    Zandbergen
    Head of ESG integration

It is the third year in a row that Robeco has achieved the best possible score for all the modules assessed by the UNPRI. The firm’s sustainability specialist, Zurich-based RobecoSAM, also received the A+ grading. 

The A+ score was awarded because of the way Robeco uses environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics and integrates sustainability principles across the entire range of funds. RobecoSAM offers sustainability products and supplies the group’s ESG data using its Corporate Sustainability Assessment and Country Sustainability Risk surveys. 

A Robeco tradition

"We are delighted to have retained the best possible rating from the PRI as it honors everything that we hold dear,” says Edith Siermann, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income and coordinator of Sustainability Investing at Robeco. 

“Obtaining the highest possible score for all UNPRI modules seems to be becoming a tradition at Robeco. We have worked very hard to integrate sustainability across most of our products and it’s great to receive recognition for this for the third year in a row.” 

“We firmly believe that integrating sustainability in the investment process leads to better-informed investment decisions, while indirectly making a contribution to a more sustainable world by raising the bar for companies in the way they are dealing with sustainability issues that are relevant for society.” 

The UNPRI is an international network of more than 1,500 investors working together to further the growth of sustainability investing. It has six core principles, led by a commitment to using environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in the investment process. Robeco has been a signatory to the principles since the group’s foundation in 2006.

Stay informed on Sustainability Investing with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on Sustainability Investing with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree