australieen
Investors cheer Japan’s adoption of negative interest rates

Investors cheer Japan’s adoption of negative interest rates

29-01-2016 | Insight

Japan’s surprise move to introduce negative interest rates will have little direct economic impact, but is great news for its battle against deflation and was cheered by investors, says Chief Economist Léon Cornelissen.

  • Léon  Cornelissen
    Léon
    Cornelissen
    Chief Economist

Speed read

  • Bank of Japan introduces deposit rate of minus 0.1%
  • Yen falls, aiding central bank’s bid to create inflation
  • Move will have repercussions for other central banks

The Bank of Japan on Friday narrowly voted to follow the European Central Bank’s example and set a rate of -0.1% for deposits left by financial institutions, though it has adopted a more complex three-tier system. It effectively means that banks are charged for leaving excess funds with the central bank, encouraging them to lend it out instead.

The Japanese stock market rallied on the news, while Japanese government bond yields declined by 10 basis points and the yen dropped sharply against  other currencies. Japan has been encouraging the yen to fall as a devalued currency helps its exporters, while making imports more expensive, thereby importing much-needed inflation.

The move will have repercussions for other central banks in setting their own interest rate policies, says Cornelissen. “It’s basically a blunt move to push down the yen and push up the Nikkei,” he says. “The material economic impact of these measures is limited, but the markets rallied anyway. The ‘safe haven’ yen rally was reversed, so the dollar/yen exchange rate is at the same level that it was at the end of last year.”

“The move will make it easier for the ECB to cut the deposit rate at its next meeting, and make it more difficult for the US Federal Reserve to raise rates. The Fed said on Wednesday that it had hit the ‘pause’ button but had the clear intention to raise rates further. But this Bank of Japan decision makes it more difficult.”

Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on our latest insights with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

Psychological impact

“So the psychological impact is high. Markets were taken by surprise because eight days ago, the Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said in the Japanese parliament that he was not thinking of introducing negative interest rates, and then eight days later, he did so.”

“However the 5-4 vote for it was a close call, and so introducing negative rates was pretty aggressive. It’s clear that we haven’t reached the limits of monetary policy yet, and Japan is now joining the club of negative interest rates of the Eurozone, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland.”

Cornelissen says the underlying economic picture in Japan remains weak, and the threat that the country fears most – deflation – is rearing its head again. The central bank’s prediction for when it will hit its 2% inflation target was moved further out to the third quarter of 2017, indicating that the country is struggling to create price rises.

“We have had a lot of pretty negative economic figures from Japan, so the macro news hasn’t been good,” he says. The Japanese economy seemed to be doing all right, because we had an upwards revision of third-quarter GDP, but if you look at the more recent data, we have seen industrial production in December falling by 1.6% and overall household spending falling by 4.4%.”

‘We have had a lot of pretty negative economic figures from Japan’

“Of course these are volatile indices, but you could argue that the first estimate of GDP figures suggested a technical recession, and then we see a huge positive reversal of these figures. So can we trust these figures? We have to be a bit skeptical because these large revisions make you reluctant to trust them, and the more recent economic news is clearly negative.”

“Japan is again on the brink of deflation because of the oil price impact, and the Bank of Japan has again adjusted its inflation forecast, saying it will reach its 2% target in the second half of 2017. We can still be skeptical about this new prognosis.”

Cornelissen says the Chinese economic slowdown is another worry for Japanese policymakers, and economic data will be unreliable over the Chinese New Year holiday period, making forecasting more difficult.

China fears resurface

“What was interesting was that in their statement they bluntly mentioned China as being one of their risks,” he says. “It’s very uncommon for central banks to do name-dropping in this way, but they singled out China, and of course that’s realistic because we’re all seeing a cyclical weakening of the Chinese economy. And with the market turmoil it is clear that the Bank of Japan wanted to send a positive signal.”

“We are now entering Chinese New Year, so we will lose sight of developments in the Chinese economy because all data will be distorted for a while due to the celebrations – it is always a nightmare for statisticians.”

In the worldwide equity portfolio, Robeco Investment Solutions is overweight Japan. “Obviously we will continue to stick to this strategy. Our position has been strengthened by the Bank of Japan’s actions,” Cornelissen says.

Subjects related to this article are:

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree