australiaen
Value of security selection versus asset allocation in credit markets

Value of security selection versus asset allocation in credit markets

15-08-1999 | Research

Should credit investors apply a top-down or a bottom-up approach? Here, we present a quantitative study of the relative merits of various forms of fixed-income research, as applied to portfolio management relative to a benchmark.

  • Erik van Leeuwen
    Erik
    van Leeuwen
    Chief Operations Investments

Speed read

  • We investigate the value added by security selection and asset allocation
  • Security selection proves most effective to generate steady outperformance
  • Results may be used to justify bottom-up management style

In this article,1 we quantify the relative merits of different styles of credit investing in a limiting ideal case. For portfolios of credit spread securities managed relative to fixed-income benchmarks, we investigate the value added by security selection and various asset allocation strategies based on “perfect foresight.”

In conducting this historical study, we rely on the simulation of such strategies using data for the Lehman Brothers US High Grade Corporate Index. Simulations of a given strategy are matched to the index in every dimension but one. The success of each strategy is evaluated on the basis of the “information ratio” a ratio of the strategy's outperformance of the index to the standard deviation of such outperformance.

Our findings suggest that security selection with “perfect foresight” in a corporate bond portfolio is the single most effective way to generate steady outperformance of the index. This applies to both the “select winners” and the “avoid losers” cases. Yield curve timing, sector rotations, and credit rating selections may deliver more outperformance, but with higher variance.

Results obtained in this study may be used to justify selection of bottom-up versus top-down portfolio management styles and allocation of research efforts and risk budgets.

1 Dynkin, L., Ferket, P., Hyman, J., Van Leeuwen, E. and Wu W., 1999, ‘Value of security selection versus asset allocation in credit markets’, The Journal of Portfolio Management.

Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Subscribe
Disclaimer

I agree to the Robeco Disclaimer and the collection and use of my personal data by Robeco, for the purposes for which such data is collected and used as set out in the Privacy Policy, including for the purpose of direct marketing of Robeco products or services.

Your data will be treated with utmost care and will not be passed on to third parties.

Logo

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree