The impact of the kind of structural change as seen with Covid is rarely limited to any one sector or place, especially in the age of globalization. This is clearly the case with climate change, as the emissions from one country can spread across borders, and the most acute effects are unpredictable and seemingly disconnected. As a result, a systems-level approach is required to build solutions and identify structural winners.
For example, electric vehicles are comprised of a complex array of disciplines including chemistry, metallurgy, semiconductors, software, robotics and supply chain management. Finding the expertise to assemble and scale those disparate technologies, within the confines of profitable established business models, has proven a challenge for incumbents and entrants alike.
And while the impacts of structural changes and transformative shifts are broadly felt, there are typically few beneficiaries. Research showed that a typical stock listed in the US from 1926 to 2019 had a buy-and-hold return of minus 2.8% over its entire lifetime. Furthermore, out of 25,000 stocks listed between 1973 and 2020 in the US, just 13% achieved a return of 25 times the initial outlay over almost half a century.
And the market is becoming increasingly narrow. Another study examining the returns of 64,000 global stocks found that the top performing 2.4% of companies accounted for all of the USD 75.7 trillion in wealth creation between 1990 and 2020, led by the big tech companies.