SI Opener: The meat supply chain is a major threat to global health

SI Opener: The meat supply chain is a major threat to global health

25-02-2021 | SI Opener
It’s not only ‘wet animal markets’ that are causing health risks, as we have seen with Covid-19. The whole meat supply chain poses a threat to global health. We have seen this in the past with swine flu and mad cow disease, and we will most likely see it in the future with other diseases and bacterial resistance due to excessive antibiotic use. There is also the contribution the meat supply chain makes to climate change through deforestation, along with problems of animal welfare, and wage and health and safety issues in factories. These problems also came to the fore during the Covid-19 crisis, but were not new, and are reasons why Robeco has engaged with companies in the meat supply chain for many years now.
  • Masja Zandbergen - Albers
    Zandbergen - Albers
    Head of sustainability Integration
  • Peter van der Werf
    van der Werf
    Engagement Specialist

Speed read

  • Meat supply chain has problems from animal welfare to emissions
  • Engagement program focused on four main areas for improvement
  • Standards have risen over three years but some areas disappointing

Such issues are not only posing problems in a societal or environmental context, but have a real business impact if not managed well. Their business impacts not only come to the fore during crises, as we have seen with the meat packing factories that had to be closed after Covid-19 infections skyrocketed. The high environmental impact of industrial livestock production is also likely to create a negative financial impact, as the industry is one of the main contributors to climate change, and is likely to be subject to more regulatory and financial scrutiny.

It is not all doom and gloom – we also see companies that are profiting from the opportunities that new ways of farming offer. But innovation needs to be encouraged though in an industry which is over 11,000 years old, going back to when the first sheep and goats were domesticated.

Climate investing: from urgency to solutions
Climate investing: from urgency to solutions
Read more

An overview of our 3-year engagement on the meat supply chain

Meat consumption has grown exponentially since the 1960s

Food consumption and production patterns determine both our health and the health of the planet. Growing populations, increasing wealth and climate change are just some of the factors that will significantly influence the global food system in the years to come. The production of meat has grown almost exponentially since the 1960s, with the majority of the rise attributed to poultry, pork and beef.

As of 2014, the average person annually consumed around 43 kg of meat per year. For European and North Americans, this is more than double, with consumers eating 80 kg to 110 kg of meat respectively. This global average is likely to increase, since similar changes in population, incomes and urbanization rates have led to growing demand for meat and animal products.

It is estimated that the agricultural sector is the world’s second-largest greenhouse gas emitter. On average, one cow produces 85 kg of methane a year. In order to reduce emissions, improve health and feed more people, urgent and radical change is needed to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement by 2030.

The main challenges and our expectations

The meat production sector faces great challenges, such as constraints from finite natural resources, the environmental impact of large-scale production, and the impact on consumer health via the spreading of animal-born human diseases from livestock resistance to antibiotics. Ultimately there are health concerns regarding the over-consumption of meat by consumers generally.

For our engagement program, we developed an indicator framework that was comprised of the following objectives: animal welfare, labor standards, product quality and safety management, and innovation management.

Animal welfare: a company’s animal welfare policy should cover various issues, such as routine mutilation, high stock densities, pre-slaughter stunning, long-distance live transportation and the use of antibiotics during the growth phase. The policy should also cover all geographic areas, supplier relations and subcontractors. We evaluated companies’ performance on three broad parameters – governance and management, leadership and innovation, and performance reporting and impact.

Labor standards: we research companies to see if they have a policy that respects fair labor conditions. We examine coverage of the policy in terms of the company’s own operations and those of its suppliers, along with its coverage in terms of various labor issues and processes to ensure compliance with it. We also look into a company’s monitoring and health and safety initiatives to ensure the better health of employees.

Product quality and safety: we evaluate how meat processors and retailers ensure that their products meet the high quality and safety expectations of customers. We want companies to have a traceability system in place where they can trace back the origin of the meat products, and also to adopt detailed food labelling. Certified and organic products are preferred. We also expect companies to follow Good Manufacturing Practices and any other relevant standards for processes. Finally, we want to see companies take part in customer education on the health impact of eating meat, with a view to reducing their meat intake.

Innovation management: areas in which we are seeing opportunities for innovation in this industry are:

  • Specialty chemicals (animal feed producers) that, for example, provide innovative solutions such as probiotics instead of antibiotics added to the food
  • Automation of food facilities, thereby reducing the risk of operational health and safety issues
  • For quick-service restaurants and retailers, the market is changing as consumer demand changes. We expect companies to actively work on diversifying their product portfolios and to engage in consumer awareness programs in their stores and franchises.

Combatting deforestation was not an official objective in these engagement efforts. However, in the last few years, we have engaged with companies and even with countries (Brazil) on this topic. This remains an issue to be concerned about and engaged with.

Helpful initiatives to assess corporate performance

In 2016, when we started this engagement theme, we held a roundtable with the UK-based investor research group Farm Animal Investment Risk and Return (FAIRR), and with the Business Benchmark for Farm Animal Welfare (BBFAW), to discuss the risks and opportunities seen through changes in the meat and fish supply chain.

We found these two initiatives very helpful in guiding our research. This roundtable helped in our development of a robust indicator framework which guided dialogues with companies. Furthermore, the Access to Nutrition Index and the PRI Deforestation Benchmark aided our research into how companies are addressing the various issues in the meat supply chain.

Our conclusion on the engagement

Our engagement focused on companies across the food supply chain, from bioscience companies, (meat) processors and food products to retailers. Companies that performed the best included those from northern Europe and Scandinavia, plus American companies in the fast food industry.

Their actions and disclosures, especially those around participation in the Carbon Disclosure Project, along with their engagement with the Cerrado Manifesto, and their establishment of science-based targets and others, highlight their commitment to sustainability, and the steps they have taken to continuously improve over the last three years.

Our engagement programs with Brazilian companies, on the other hand, were closed as being non-effective, given their significant lags compared to peers across most objectives. We want these companies to do well on this topic and we remain involved as long as we are invested in them.

SI Opener
SI Opener
Seeing is believing.
Read all articles



What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree