australieen
The Eurozone is outperforming the US

The Eurozone is outperforming the US

09-11-2017 | Yearly outlook
It may come as a surprise, but the once-troubled Eurozone is now doing better than the US.
  • Léon  Cornelissen
    Léon
    Cornelissen
    Chief Economist

With the growing popularity of the term of ‘secular stagnation’, the talk about the Japanification of the Eurozone economy and increasing worries about an aging population, the contrarian reality is that the world economy is currently on the upswing.

And another surprise is that underlying growth in the Eurozone is currently stronger than in the US. In 2016, the economy grew 1.8% in the Eurozone compared to 1.5% in the US. In 2017, we expect these figures to reach 2.25% and 2.0%, respectively. This is exceptional given that the US is generally assumed to have a higher potential growth rate than the Eurozone due to more favorable demographics. Based solely on population growth and thus disregarding changes in participation rates, the US rate would be around 0.5% higher.

Other factors that contribute to potential growth are total factor productivity and capital investment. Total factor productivity cannot be measured directly, and is therefore usually estimated in the form of a residual by stripping away the estimated impact of capital investment from the economy’s average output per hour.

Investment outlook 2018
Investment outlook 2018

Would you like to read the full report 'Playing in extra time'?

Download full publication
Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, IMF

Most of the declines in output observed since the Great Recession are now attributed to declines in potential GDP. Pessimism about productivity growth has become rampant, but there is no reason to believe there is much of a difference between the two economic blocks. Current estimates hover around 1.0%, which is far below the 1.5% to 1.75% range observed over the longer term. As US output is assumed to grow more or less in line with potential growth, according to these estimates, the Eurozone is growing above its estimated potential.

By contrast, the monetary policies in the two blocks are diametrically opposed: in the US, the Fed has started normalizing interest rates and reducing its balance sheet, while in the Eurozone, the European Central Bank is only just beginning to phase out quantitative easing. The ECB deposit rate is still negative and any rate hikes are a long way off.

The solution to this apparent mismatch is of course linked to the fact that the Eurozone is not a single economy. This is best illustrated by the development of the output gap, the difference between actual and potential growth in the participating counties. According to the OECD, in Germany, this gap already closed in 2015, so its economy is facing increasing inflationary risks, while France and Italy are still showing huge gaps (above 2%).

Of course, these potential growth estimates must be treated with caution. Not long ago, and well after the over-optimistic ‘new economy’ debate, the ECB estimated the potential growth of the euro area in 2005 at 2.0%-2.5%. But it seems fair to say that the Eurozone’s current monetary policy is extremely accommodative, which will allow the region to boom for a while longer. We are playing in extra time. Due to the huge differences in output gaps, Germany will probably have to accept an above-target inflation rate (> 2.0%), as the ECB allows France and Italy to catch up.

This article forms part of the Robeco 2018 outlook entitled Playing in Extra Time.

Investment outlook 2018
Investment outlook 2018

Playing in extra time

Read all articles
Subjects related to this article are:

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree