australiaen
The impact of incentive schemes on asset prices

The impact of incentive schemes on asset prices

30-08-2017 | From the field

Incentives matter. But how much do they influence asset prices?

  • Pim  van Vliet, PhD
    Pim
    van Vliet, PhD
    Head of Conservative Equities

Nowadays, most investors delegate money management to professional asset managers, whose compensation has little downside risk and high upside potential due to variable compensation. At Robeco, we believe that such option-like incentives is one of the reasons the low-volatility effect is growing stronger. Experimental economics offers some deeper insights into this.

In a controlled trading environment, professor Kleinlercher and his co-authors* let 480 students trade a low-risk asset and a high-risk asset. When all market participants had bonus incentives, the risky asset ended up being overvalued by a hefty 70%. Meanwhile, when some investors had a linear incentive structure and a penalty incentive structure, the risky asset ended up with a significantly lower 30% overvaluation. In this case, investors with option-like incentives lost money while those with linear payoffs were able to grow their wealth and generate good total returns.

These results show how option-like incentives can strongly distort the price of low and high-risk assets. That’s good news for prudent investors: they may benefit from other bonus maximizing investors who rationally overpay for risk.

*‘The impact of different incentive schemes on asset prices’, Daniel Kleinlercher, Jürgen Huber and Michael Kirchler, European Economic Review, Volume 68, May 2014, Pages 137–150.

Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Subscribe
From the field
From the field

Our researchers publish many whitepapers based on their own empirical studies; they also follow quantitative research done by others.

Read all articles

Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree