Monetary authorities are likely to continue repressing sovereign borrowing costs well below the nominal rate of economic growth, for years to come. The era of great financial repression may have only just begun.
As the second virus wave across Europe is rising, in turn prompting renewed (partial) lockdowns, expectations are mounting that the ECB will be soon forced to deliver further easing. This should ensure that the additional fiscal support needed to bridge companies and households through the second wave does not translate into higher borrowing costs for (some) Eurozone member states. Looking further ahead, we suspect monetary authorities, both the ECB and many other central banks, will continue to repress sovereign borrowing costs well below the nominal rate of economic growth for years to come – so as to prevent primary budget deficits from leading to even higher public debt-to-GDP ratios. The era of great financial repression may indeed have only just begun!
The adoption of a 2% average inflation target should aid the US Federal Reserve’s financial repression efforts. In China, where nominal GDP growth is improving amid a seemingly controlled virus situation, the central bank has completely dropped its earlier easing bias. However, we suspect that sustaining private sector credit growth may require a further decline in official lending rates. Hence, we second-guess the market’s expectation for the PBoC to continue to swim against the (global monetary) flow.
Whether or not there will be an agreement on additional fiscal stimulus ahead of the elections will be important for the potential impact on rates of the 3 November elections. If a deal would be reached, the impact of the election result on rates will probably be modest. The more likely scenario is no deal before the election. This implies uncertainty will prevail for now. Uncertainty on fiscal negotiations as well as on the acceptance of the election result. To be clear, a contested election is the main risk to fiscal stimulus shorter term, as stimulus talks will come to a complete standstill in such an environment. For nearly all outcomes we do expect meaningful stimulus, albeit with some delay. The only outcome in which we don’t expect much stimulus is a Trump victory and a Democratic Congress.
While ECB president Lagarde acknowledged at the September news conference that the ECB was closely monitoring the appreciation of the euro exchange rate, and continued “to stand ready to adjust all of its instruments”, she shied away from hinting strongly at imminent action. Moreover, although the forward guidance that rates could end up at “lower levels” was maintained, Lagarde seemed to (again) put more emphasis on PEPP. However, the recently released minutes from the September meeting serve as a strong reminder that, given the subdued inflation outlook, the ECB retains an easing bias and that all instruments are on the table.
In our view, the growing risk of a persistent inflation target undershoot will likely prompt the ECB to deliver further easing before the turn of the year.
Rhetoric from the PBoC has turned increasingly less dovish over the past few months. It seems authorities are progressively less concerned about the economic outlook, and content with the improvement in the closely watched credit ‘impulse’. Our economic barometer for China confirms that the recovery has continued apace. However, consumer spending, while also steadily improving, still lags production growth. Moreover, the recent decision to scrap the bank’s reserve requirement ratio for FX derivate sales (from the current 20%) – to stem the appreciation of the CNY – is an indication that the PBoC does not want financial conditions to tighten (much) further.
The Suga administration took office on 16 September with a higher approval ratio (74%; Nikkei) than the second Abe administration had at its start. Suga announced that he will move forward with Abe’s policy stance, but that regulatory reform is the core of this administration’s policy. While we agree on the merits of such a focus, we expect little and only slow progress over time, given Japan’s structural struggles in this area. Japan’s economy has long faced the challenge of how to conquer population aging and decline in order to raise productivity growth and potential growth. The Covid-19 outbreak highlighted that the adoption of digitalization has been slow and that many face-to-face industries like the service sector have to change their business models to adjust to the new.
Overall, we don’t see a material difference between the policies of Abe and Suga, nor in the implications for the overall economy and the BoJ. In that sense, the BoJ’s current role of fiscal financier to the government is unlikely to change.
Please read this important information before proceeding further. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information contained on this website.
The information contained in the Website is NOT FOR RETAIL CLIENTS - The information contained in the Website is solely intended for professional investors, defined as investors which (1) qualify as professional clients within the meaning of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), (2) have requested to be treated as professional clients within the meaning of the MiFID or (3) are authorized to receive such information under any other applicable laws. The value of the investments may fluctuate. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Neither Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. nor any of its affiliates guarantees the performance or the future returns of any investments. If the currency in which the past performance is displayed differs from the currency of the country in which you reside, then you should be aware that due to exchange rate fluctuations the performance shown may increase or decrease if converted into your local currency.
In the UK, Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. (“ROBECO”) only markets its funds to institutional clients and professional investors. Private investors seeking information about ROBECO should visit our corporate website www.robeco.com or contact their financial adviser. ROBECO will not be liable for any damages or losses suffered by private investors accessing these areas.
In the UK, ROBECO Funds has marketing approval for the funds listed on this website, all of which are UCITS funds. ROBECO is authorized by the AFM and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority are available from us on request.
Many of the protections provided by the United Kingdom regulatory framework may not apply to investments in ROBECO Funds, including access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and the Financial Ombudsman Service. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information on this website.
If you are not an institutional client or professional investor you should therefore not proceed. By proceeding please note that we will be treating you as a professional client for regulatory purposes and you agree to be bound by our terms and conditions.