united kingdomen
Governance issues underline need for ESG integration

Governance issues underline need for ESG integration

16-11-2015 | Insight

In recent months, several telecom companies with operations in emerging markets were faced with corporate governance issues. These issues had huge consequences and highlighted the negative risks for bondholders. They show that integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into the analysis is key in assessing the downside risk of credit investments.

  • Jankees Ruizeveld
    Jankees
    Ruizeveld
    Senior Research Analyst

Speed read

  • Recent issues at telecoms had huge financial consequences
  • Governance issues have a greater impact in emerging markets
  • ESG integration helps to understand downside risk in credits

One of the cornerstones of the investment philosophy of Robeco’s Credit team is that avoiding losers is more important than picking every winner. This is a direct consequence of the fact that at best bond investors get their money back plus compensation in the form of interest, where on the downside they could lose it all. Analyzing ESG information helps us to understand the downside risk better and spot potential losers.

In this article we focus on the ‘governance’ element in ESG, or to be more precise, corporate governance. Corporate governance is the set of processes, customs, policies, laws and institutions affecting the way in which a company is run. It also includes the relationships among the many players involved (the stakeholders) and the corporate goals. Stakeholders include shareholders, management, and the board of directors but also employees, suppliers, customers, banks and other lenders, regulators, the environment and the community at large.

In emerging markets, companies tend to be confronted with corporate governance issues more frequently than in developed markets. Examples are having criminal partners or the more common practices of bribery and corruption. Some telecom companies, for example, have been asked to make illicit payments to obtain licenses in certain emerging markets. We think that in some cases telecom companies have not properly evaluated the risks of doing business in these countries at the time of entering them.

Stay informed on Sustainability Investing with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on Sustainability Investing with monthly mail updates
Subscribe

Recent issues highlight corporate governance risk in emerging markets

Recently several telecom companies have had to deal with corporate governance issues related to their business in emerging markets:

  • MTN, a South African telecom company operating in Africa and the Middle East, received a huge fine of over USD 5bn from the Nigerian regulator relating to a minor incident of not timely disconnecting some unregistered users. The scale of the fine is clearly not in line with the wrongdoing.
  • Millicom, a Swedish based emerging market mobile telecom provider, self-reported to law enforcement authorities in the US and Sweden potential improper payments made by its joint venture in Guatemala. Very few specific details were provided, so it is impossible to anticipate the outcome at this point in time. There is no indication of who made the payment and why it was made.
  • TeliaSonera, the Swedish-Finnish incumbent, announced they will plan an exit from their seven markets in Eurasia: Nepal, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Tajikistan. The company links its decision to corporate governance issues the company has experienced in these markets.
  • Vimpelcom, the Russian telecom company, said it had made USD 900 million of provisions for potential fines which may arise from a US-Dutch probe into its activities in Uzbekistan. US and Dutch authorities suspect Vimpelcom may have made illicit payments to a company close to Gulnara Karimova, daughter of Uzbek President Islam Karimov, in order to obtain operating licenses.
  • Telenor, the Norwegian incumbent and largest telephone operator in the Nordic region, has a 33 percent stake in VimpelCom. The investigation at Vimpelcom has already brought on the resignation of Telenor’s chairman. Svein Aaser stepped down after the Norwegian government had withdrawn its support amid the alleged corruption scandal. Telenor has also decided to give up on its Russian investment after 16 years and sell its entire stake in Vimpelcom.

One of the reasons that these matters are becoming a bigger issue is that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has moved its focus to the telecom sector. At the same time, the DOJ wants to hold individuals, mostly corporate executives, more accountable for corporate wrongdoing.

As these examples show, (telecom) companies are more likely to be confronted with issues like having criminal partners or the practice to bribe politicians to obtain licenses in emerging markets than in developed markets. In addition, they demonstrate that corporate governance issues can have far-reaching consequences, both financially for the company and personally for its directors. Investors were also impacted directly by the controversies described in the examples; bonds have been hit hard as they reflect the increased financial risks of underlying companies.

The Robeco Credit team has been very cautious on emerging markets over the last year.  Spreads have been too low compared with spreads in developed credit markets. These examples show in our opinion that emerging market credits should carry a country or corporate governance premium, even if their credit ratings are in line with developed market credits. This additional spread is the compensation we demand for running higher credit risk.

ESG fully integrated into our investment process

Understanding potential corporate governance issues for telecom companies operating in emerging markets is a key element in understanding the downside risk of the credit investments in these companies.  This is why we have integrated ESG into our credit research process. We treat the ESG variable as one of the five building blocks that underpin our final fundamental opinion on a company’s credit. In addition, we do our own proprietary research, also on ESG. The recent issues in the telecom sector strengthen our belief in this approach.

Subjects related to this article are:

Disclaimer

Please read this important information before proceeding further. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information contained on this website.

The information contained in the Website is NOT FOR RETAIL CLIENTS - The information contained in the Website is solely intended for professional investors, defined as investors which (1) qualify as professional clients within the meaning of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), (2) have requested to be treated as professional clients within the meaning of the MiFID or (3) are authorized to receive such information under any other applicable laws. The value of the investments may fluctuate. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Neither Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. nor any of its affiliates guarantees the performance or the future returns of any investments. If the currency in which the past performance is displayed differs from the currency of the country in which you reside, then you should be aware that due to exchange rate fluctuations the performance shown may increase or decrease if converted into your local currency.

In the UK, Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. (“ROBECO”) only markets its funds to institutional clients and professional investors. Private investors seeking information about ROBECO should visit our corporate website www.robeco.com or contact their financial adviser. ROBECO will not be liable for any damages or losses suffered by private investors accessing these areas.

In the UK, ROBECO Funds has marketing approval for the funds listed on this website, all of which are UCITS funds. ROBECO is authorized by the AFM and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority are available from us on request.

Many of the protections provided by the United Kingdom regulatory framework may not apply to investments in ROBECO Funds, including access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and the Financial Ombudsman Service. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information on this website.

If you are not an institutional client or professional investor you should therefore not proceed. By proceeding please note that we will be treating you as a professional client for regulatory purposes and you agree to be bound by our terms and conditions.

If you do not accept these terms and conditions, as well as the terms of use of the website, please do not continue to use or access any pages on this website.

I Disagree