Please read this important information before proceeding further. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information contained on this website.
The information contained in the Website is NOT FOR RETAIL CLIENTS - The information contained in the Website is solely intended for professional investors, defined as investors which (1) qualify as professional clients within the meaning of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), (2) have requested to be treated as professional clients within the meaning of the MiFID or (3) are authorized to receive such information under any other applicable laws. The value of the investments may fluctuate. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Neither Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. nor any of its affiliates guarantees the performance or the future returns of any investments. If the currency in which the past performance is displayed differs from the currency of the country in which you reside, then you should be aware that due to exchange rate fluctuations the performance shown may increase or decrease if converted into your local currency.
In the UK, Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. (“ROBECO”) only markets its funds to institutional clients and professional investors. Private investors seeking information about ROBECO should visit our corporate website www.robeco.com or contact their financial adviser. ROBECO will not be liable for any damages or losses suffered by private investors accessing these areas.
In the UK, ROBECO Funds has marketing approval for the funds listed on this website, all of which are UCITS funds. ROBECO is authorized by the AFM and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority are available from us on request.
Many of the protections provided by the United Kingdom regulatory framework may not apply to investments in ROBECO Funds, including access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and the Financial Ombudsman Service. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information on this website.
If you are not an institutional client or professional investor you should therefore not proceed. By proceeding please note that we will be treating you as a professional client for regulatory purposes and you agree to be bound by our terms and conditions.
Strong brands is one of the trends Robeco Global Consumer Trends Equities capitalizes on. Fund manager Jack Neele discusses Interbrand's latest 100 most valuable brands. And talks about relevant brands and brands that miss the boat.
“It is more interesting to rank the 100 most valuable brands in terms of how that value has increased or decreased. This reveals trends relating to the products consumers are using and how they perceive companies and brands,” says Jack Neele, Manager of Robeco Global Consumer Trends Equities, referring to Interbrand's annual list of 100 most valuable brands.
This brand consultancy has calculated not only the value of the brands, but also whether this value has risen or fallen. Eight of the ten largest positions in the Robeco Global Consumer Trends Equities portfolio are in the top 100.
“Consumers are attracted to brand products. This has always been the case, and it always will be. And this applies not only to consumers in developed economies, but also to consumers in emerging markets. Increasing wealth means the demand for Western luxury products is on the rise in these countries,” Neele explains.
In addition to strong brands, the digital consumer and the emerging market consumer are other trends in which Neele's fund is invested. “Strong brands have also developed in our digital world of smartphones and tablets, software, apps, search engines and online shopping in recent years.”
“The strong rise in technology brands. The three biggest climbers are all technology companies: Facebook, Apple and Amazon. The technology sector is strongly represented and a third of the 100 most valuable brands are tech brands.”
“A division is emerging between new generation brands and those favored by the previous generation. The top ten includes Coca-Cola, IBM and McDonalds – whose value has been falling slowly for years. Coca-Cola and McDonald’s are struggling in the wake of healthy eating trends and IBM is old technology.
“This I find hard to fathom. Microsoft is really active in cloud services, but has had very little success in the mobile phone market. My perception is that Microsoft's strength is waning.”
“Hermès is a brand that moves with the times, knows how to stay relevant and responds to consumer preferences. An example of this is the Apple Watch Hermès, for which the fashion label developed the clock face and handmade leather strap. This enables Hermès to position itself with a trendy brand like Apple, while for Apple the fact that a luxury brand like Hermès is supporting its watch is a status enhancer.”
“I think Nike and Starbucks are good examples. Nike produces apps that allow people to share their sports performances through social media. And at Starbucks you can use your mobile phone to order and pay for products. These companies are embracing new technologies and using them to their advantage. Consumers appreciate this, which translates into an ongoing increase in brand value.”
“Many Western car makers have been working on their brand value for over half a century, and Japanese and South Korean car makers for several decades. I don't see Tesla.”
“Consumer confidence takes a long time to build but can evaporate overnight. Volkswagen's reputation has been driven off a cliff and regaining consumer confidence will take years.
“Like McDonald’s, KFC is a brand that was favored by the previous generation. Chipotle is the new generation's preferred choice. It's not fast food, but is referred to as fast casual. It is a combination of fast and personal, with better-quality ingredients. Customers can choose what they want in their burrito, which is then prepared in front of them. This freedom of choice appeals to modern consumers. It's totally different from ready-made hamburgers that are served from the bowels of a kitchen. However, the concept of customization is perhaps even more important than the Mexican food. I expect Chipotle will make it onto the list of most valuable brands in the coming years.”
‘McDonald’s and KFC are brands favored by the previous generation.’
“Nike is more successful at penetrating the markets in which Adidas was traditionally strong, like football, but the reverse does not apply to the same extent. Under Armour is bigger than Adidas in the US – it is also a brand that is favored by the new generation. It sponsors young talent such as Memphis Depay and Jordan Spieth.”
“I believe that Alibaba is among the 100 most valuable brands, but it's not on the list. The top 10 are extremely Western, I find, with mainly US and European brands and a sprinkling of Japanese and South Korean ones. While many Chinese brands compete on price, this is not a characteristic of a strong brand.”
“Uber, Victoria’s Secret, Twitter and Instagram to name but a few. I can imagine that it is difficult to determine the brand value of an unlisted company like Uber. This also applies to brands that are part of a larger company like lingerie brand Victoria's Secret, a subsidiary of L Brands, and Instagram, which is owned by Facebook.”
Manufacturers that can use the strength of their brands to generate consumer loyalty, to exert pricing power and to stay relevant over time are an interesting investment opportunity for Robeco Global Consumer Trends Equities.