Please read this important information before proceeding further. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information contained on this website.
The information contained in the Website is NOT FOR RETAIL CLIENTS - The information contained in the Website is solely intended for professional investors, defined as investors which (1) qualify as professional clients within the meaning of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), (2) have requested to be treated as professional clients within the meaning of the MiFID or (3) are authorized to receive such information under any other applicable laws. The value of the investments may fluctuate. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Neither Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. nor any of its affiliates guarantees the performance or the future returns of any investments. If the currency in which the past performance is displayed differs from the currency of the country in which you reside, then you should be aware that due to exchange rate fluctuations the performance shown may increase or decrease if converted into your local currency.
In the UK, Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. (“ROBECO”) only markets its funds to institutional clients and professional investors. Private investors seeking information about ROBECO should visit our corporate website www.robeco.com or contact their financial adviser. ROBECO will not be liable for any damages or losses suffered by private investors accessing these areas.
In the UK, ROBECO Funds has marketing approval for the funds listed on this website, all of which are UCITS funds. ROBECO is authorized by the AFM and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority are available from us on request.
Many of the protections provided by the United Kingdom regulatory framework may not apply to investments in ROBECO Funds, including access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and the Financial Ombudsman Service. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information on this website.
If you are not an institutional client or professional investor you should therefore not proceed. By proceeding please note that we will be treating you as a professional client for regulatory purposes and you agree to be bound by our terms and conditions.
Do you know why it makes sense to invest in an enhanced low-volatility strategy rather than a generic alternative?
That is just one question answered by Pim van Vliet, Senior Portfolio Manager of Robeco Conservative Equities, in a new FAQ on low-volatility investing.
So why does opting for an enhanced low-volatility strategy make sense? As Van Vliet explains, it is because an enhanced strategy, such as Robeco Conservative Equity, can overcome some serious pitfalls associated with low-volatility investing.
“Generic low-volatility strategies, which may be based on a single backward-looking statistical risk measure, such as volatility or beta, are exposed to unnecessary downside risk, high turnover in illiquid stocks and concentration risks,” he explains.
By contrast, the Robeco Conservative Equity strategy captures the low-volatility premium more efficiently by reducing risk and enhancing return. Risk is reduced by using a combination of statistical risk variables and by including forward-looking risk measures based on a proprietary distress-risk model. Meanwhile, returns are enhanced by selecting low-volatility stocks which also have attractive valuation and sentiment characteristics.
“Not every low-volatility stock is created equal: some are destined to perform better than others,” observes Van Vliet. “We improve risk-adjusted returns by selecting low-volatile stocks that also have attractive return potential.” Chart 1 shows the difference between Robeco Conservative Equity and a generic low-volatility strategy.
‘Generic low-volatility strategies are exposed to unnecessary downside risk, high turnover in illiquid stocks and concentration risks’