netherlandsnl
The case against the size premium

The case against the size premium

14-12-2016 | From the field

This Research Affiliates research note argues that the size premium does not exist. They acknowledge that long-term US data suggests a size premium of 3.4%, while global data suggests a size premium of 1% since the effect was first documented in the early 1980s.

  • David Blitz
    David
    Blitz
    Head of Quant Research

However, they then argue that (1) there is an upward bias in size premium estimates due to inaccurate returns on delisted stocks in major databases, (2) indices and hypothetical portfolios ignore trading costs, (3) the statistical significance of the size premium estimates is likely overstated due to data-mining and reporting bias, (4) the statistical significance is very weak, and (5) there is no outperformance on a risk-adjusted basis.

The authors emphasize that their results do not imply that investors should stop investing in small-cap stocks, only that investors should not expect these stocks as a group to deliver superior returns.

From the field
From the field

Onze onderzoekers publiceren veel whitepapers die zijn gebaseerd op hun eigen empirische onderzoek, maar ze kijken ook naar kwantitatief onderzoek dat door anderen is gedaan. David Blitz, hoofd Quant Equities Research, vertelt over opvallende externe papers.

Lees alle artikelen
Blijf op de hoogte van kwantitatieve inzichten
Blijf op de hoogte van kwantitatieve inzichten
Aanmelden
Gerelateerd aan dit artikel: