nederlandnl
Enhancing a low-volatility strategy is particularly helpful when generic low volatility is expensive

Enhancing a low-volatility strategy is particularly helpful when generic low volatility is expensive

01-06-2012 | Research

Frequently the question comes up if low-volatility is ‘expensive’, measured by multiples such as P/E and P/B ratios. The investors asking this are sometimes worried about the expected performance of low-volatility in such an environment. In this note, we address this question using an extended 82-year sample period for the US stock market.

  • Pim  van Vliet, PhD
    Pim
    van Vliet, PhD
    Head of Conservative Equities and Quant Allocation

We find that a generic lowvolatility strategy sometimes exhibits value (1990s) and sometimes growth (1930s) characteristics. An enhanced low-volatility strategy, which includes valuation and sentiment factors, yields a much better return/risk ratio than a generic low-volatility strategy and is necessary to achieve superior long-term returns.

Recently, the P/B ratio of a generic low-volatility strategy has become relatively high again. Historically, generic low-volatility underperforms the market in such an environment, but proves effective to lower the risk. An enhanced low-volatility strategy is particularly helpful when generic low-volatility is expensive and improves the return of a generic low-volatility strategy by up to 6% per year.

Ontdek de nieuwste inzichten
Ontdek de nieuwste inzichten
Aanmelden

Leave your details and receive the Whitepaper

This report is not available for users from countries where the offering of foreign financial services is not permitted, such as US citizens and residents.