Confermo di essere un cliente professionale
Le informazioni e le opinioni contenute in questa sezione del Sito cui sta accedendo sono destinate esclusivamente a Clienti Professionali come definiti dal Regolamento Consob n. 16190 del 29 ottobre 2007 (articolo 26 e Allegato 3) e dalla Direttiva CE n. 2004/39 (Allegato II), e sono concepite ad uso esclusivo di tali categorie di soggetti. Ne è vietata la divulgazione, anche solo parziale.
Al fine di accedere a tale sezione riservata, si prega di confermare di essere un Cliente Professionale, declinando Robeco qualsivoglia responsabilità in caso di accesso effettuato da una persona che non sia un cliente professionale.
In ogni caso, le informazioni e le opinioni ivi contenute non costituiscono un'offerta o una sollecitazione all'investimento e non costituiscono una raccomandazione o consiglio, anche di carattere fiscale, o un'offerta, finalizzate all'investimento, e non devono in alcun caso essere interpretate come tali.
Prima di ogni investimento, per una descrizione dettagliata delle caratteristiche, dei rischi e degli oneri connessi, si raccomanda di esaminare il Prospetto, i KIIDs delle classi autorizzate per la commercializzazione in Italia, la relazione annuale o semestrale e lo Statuto, disponibili sul presente Sito o presso i collocatori.
L’investimento in prodotti finanziari è soggetto a fluttuazioni, con conseguente variazione al rialzo o al ribasso dei prezzi, ed è possibile che non si riesca a recuperare l'importo originariamente investito.
The European peripheral countries have not made any further progress in the RobecoSAM Country Sustainability Ranking. The most striking development is the continued political turbulence that Italy is facing. Leader Sweden is the only advanced economy that has seen a notable increase in its score; the other winners, most notably the United Arab Emirates and Israel, are emerging markets.
The RobecoSAM Country Sustainability Ranking analyzes the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) profiles of 65 countries around the globe. Updated twice a year, it scrutinizes ESG data from 22 developed and 43 emerging market economies to calculate an overall country score. The chart below shows the latest rankings.
The two countries whose scores have deteriorated the most are Ukraine and South Korea. The political situation in Ukraine continues to be tense, while South Korea was rocked by the removal of former President Park Geun-hye in a corruption scandal this year. Tensions with North Korea are also rising. The election of Moon Jae-in in May could restore calm, as he has promised to address corruption, curb the influence of conglomerates (chaebols), and take a more conciliatory approach towards its northern neighbor.
Finland consolidated its leading position among the European Monetary Union (EMU) member states. Behind Finland in the EMU ranking comes the Republic of Ireland, which continued to stabilize its overall sustainability profile. However, the country is faced with major uncertainty brought about by the UK’s Brexit decision. Britain’s withdrawal from the EU could damage British-Irish cooperation, with unintended consequences in areas such as trade, foreign direct investment, energy, migration, and the Republic’s future relationship with Northern Ireland. All of these could have potential ramifications for the country’s sustainability profile, especially in areas such as political risk and competitiveness.
The European peripheral countries did not make further progress in their sustainability performance. Greece is once again in negotiations for a new debt relief deal with EU officials and the IMF. In May, the Greek government slashed its GDP growth forecast for 2017 by 1 percentage point to 1.8%, as it moved towards implementing new austerity measures. Social and political tensions are likely to rise again. As a result, Greece will continue to occupy the bottom position among EMU members in the foreseeable future.
Ranked 25th, the initial progress made by Spain just after the financial crisis has stalled during the last two years. Much of this stagnation can be explained by the delicate socio-economic conditions and the political uncertainty that has marked recent years. In Spain, the crisis has left deep sores that are still visible in high unemployment, inequality, poverty and inadequate education.
Italy has also endured some politically turbulent months, causing a renewed decline of its political risk rating following a temporary recovery in 2016. Even though the country has initiated some reforms, the business climate is still impaired by considerable inefficiencies in public administration, slow judicial processes, inadequate regulations and a lack of competition. Further reform efforts will be needed to improve the business environment, increase workers’ skills and reduce poverty, all of which are essential for more sustainable economic growth. Italy needs to restore the political stability that would allow these kinds of policy measures to be implemented.
Singapore has defended its clear leadership in sustainability performance in the emerging markets universe. Ranked 16, it has even outpaced several advanced economies. India has resumed its gradual upward trend. Thanks to the Bharatiya Janata Party’s major victory in legislative elections in India’s most populous state of Uttar Pradesh in March, Prime Minister Modi has consolidated his power, which augurs well for future plans.
Political uncertainty in Turkey remains high, and is the most important risk driver for the country’s future ESG trend. President Erdogan has continued his crackdown on opponents, has been re-elected leader of the ruling AKP party, and has resumed talks on reintroducing the death penalty — indicators pointing towards an increasingly authoritarian future for Turkey. This does not bode well for the Turkish economy, its political stability, or a return to normalized relations with the European Union and other western countries.
An increasing number of emerging market countries are faced with a rapidly worsening demographic transition, which will adversely affect their economic growth potential. The trend is most acute in China, which has already seen the share of its working-age population shrink by 1 percentage point to 73.2% from 2010 to 2015, and UN projections suggest a further decline to 58.9% by 2050. A similar, albeit slightly less pronounced trend is projected for Brazil. In contrast, the percentage of working-age persons in India is expected to slightly expand from 65.6% in 2015 to 67.1% in 2050.