The time when digitization was an activity for technology companies alone has gone. Technological innovation is no longer solely the domain of big internet companies and hip startups in Silicon Valley. More and more and more ‘normal’ companies, in a wide range of business sectors, are embracing technological developments.
Zara and Victoria’s Secret are two examples of retailers that understand how it works. While the physical store and online shop are still two separate concepts at many companies, at these retailers they’re becoming more and more intertwined. Sports brands like Nike and Under Armour understand this too. By introducing health apps like MyFitnessPal and Endomondo, they are responding to the needs of modern consumers and are even creating communities.
Victoria’s Secret is performing much better than for example Abercrombie & Fitch or Esprit, and Nike and Under Armour are winning territory from Adidas. Scale is important if you want to be a front runner in brand digitization. Increased sales and profit mean larger free cash flows, which can be invested in technological developments. Global players therefore have an advantage over regional or local ones.
Starbucks – in essence, nothing other than a place to drink coffee – is a textbook example of a non-tech company that embraces technological innovation and uses it to generate customer loyalty. This ranges from their recently launched Mobile Order and Pay service, where you can walk into your local store and pick up your freshly made coffee without having to wait in line, to Twitter try-outs inviting you to 'Tweet a Coffee' to your friends.
'Stop moving with the times and you risk becoming irrelevant'
In the US mobile payments now account for 20% of all in-store orders. The advantages are clear: shorter waiting times and easier payment enhance the user experience. These may seem like small steps, but they are actually a sign of 'big thinking' when it comes to digitization. Starbucks is moving with the times – in other words, responding to changes in the consumers' world. It is the best way to stay relevant in a changing world. Stop moving with the times and you’re at risk of becoming irrelevant for modern consumers.
At Starbucks they are very aware of the importance of technology. Founder Howard Schultz is arguably more fascinated by technology than by coffee. The same applies to Robert Iger, CEO at Disney – another company that is leading the way in technological innovation.
Its MagicBand gives Disney World visitors priority to a number of top attractions, but also functions as their hotel room key and registers any purchases they make during their stay – which they only need to pay for when checking out. Shorter waiting times and easier payment – with higher sales as a result.
Here, too, customer experience is seamlessly linked to commercial interests. It's no coincidence that a top man like Iger is also on the board of a large technology company like Apple. His passion for technology plays a part in this, but this role also places him close to the action and on the front line of technological innovation.
The transition from cash to electronic payment has really taken off in 2015. It’s the smaller players in the digital transactions market that, despite being mere cogs in the wheel, are overcoming the barriers. What is interesting, however, is that the big players – Visa, MasterCard and American Express – have contributed little to this, but are reaping the benefits, because ultimately no one can circumvent their platforms. As a result, they are further strengthening their positions.
PayPal is perhaps the biggest online payment brand for consumers. Yet here the same holds true: their transactions take place via one of the three credit card powerhouses. Apple Pay? Although you pay with your phone, this process also involves providing credit card details during registration. The big credit card companies are profiting from the innovation of small players and forming all kinds of partnerships with them. With no disruptor in sight. The much-hyped (in some circles) bitcoin for example is only able to process a fraction of the transactions per second that Visa can.
Winner take all. This applies not only to strong brands and digital payment transactions, but certainly also to the battle for digital consumers. Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google – abbreviated to the acronym FANG – are the victors in this battle, in which more and more challengers like Twitter and Yelp seem to be losing ground. It is a select group of winners and this is not set to change in 2016. The four still have a strong position when it comes to further future growth potential and increased domination.
Facebook for instance owns Instagram and Whatsapp, which in themselves are monster platforms and still offer a great many opportunities. And Google still has plenty up its sleeve, with YouTube, self-driving cars and robotics. In the mobile ad market, eight out of every ten dollars are spent with either Google or Facebook, making them an essential platform for every advertiser.
Of course there are successful niche players as well, in very clearly defined markets where the brand and expertise they have built up prevent them from simply being trampled on. Expedia and Priceline depend to a certain extent on Google’s search engine; even so they have managed to claim the market for travel bookings.
Although Airbnb entered this segment as a disruptor, alongside competition within the market it has also created a wider offering at both the top end (luxury accommodation) and the bottom end (budget accommodation).
There is also room for niche players within segments like second-hand cars and the housing market. Often only the number-one player in the relevant niche market is able to justify its existence and the rest may question their own existence in the long term. Outside these few niche markets however FANG cover all the key areas of the market.
The number of digital consumers is increasing by leaps and bounds in emerging markets too, and at an even faster pace than in the West. Entire phases are being skipped. E-commerce penetration in China has now exceeded 12% – an even higher level than in many developed countries. And digital ads are taking off there. A very small number of parties dominate the Chinese market, with China’s answer to FANG comprising three companies: Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent (BAT).
The fact that the shift to online retail sales is happening at such a lightning pace relates in part to the poor state of bricks and mortar shops and infrastructure in China. Alibaba and JD.com have a firm hold on this market. And while Tencent may be a local player, it owns some of the largest social networks in the world (including WeChat, the Chinese version of Whatsapp) and is big in online gaming.
The company also has Uber-style taxi and online food order services. It is a textbook example of an O2O strategy (online to offline), serving tens of millions of people. The advantage of Tencent over Baidu and Alibaba is that its strategy is based on cross-selling partnerships rather than its own investments, making its operations less capital-intensive.
Compared with FANG, the BAT trio has managed to acquire an even more dominant position in its domestic market, China. Yet this is also a matter of concern for the future. The growth potential of Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent within China is considerable, but the question is how far the expansion can continue beyond the country's borders. Still, at least in the internal market they don't need to worry about their US counterparts. Amazon has been trying in vain to gain a foothold in China for years, but without help from the government this is proving impossible.
All of these market leaders are well positioned and should be able to further extend their competitive advantage in 2016. Their operational outlook is good and as long as they can retain their lead in terms of technological innovation, they will be able to increase their dominance.
'There’s no sign of new challengers entering the market and taking pole position'
Of course things can always go wrong. There’ll always be new challengers entering the market that take pole position – a threat that will perhaps eventually become a reality for Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google too. But there are no signs of this yet and all of the innovative small players rely on the infrastructure of these four giants.
In a world where consumption growth will be moderate at best, it is more important than ever to invest in the market leaders. And it is crucially important to be selective and invest in companies with a structural competitive advantage that understand and respond to consumers’ needs. As such companies have the best sense of what consumers are looking for and how their needs change, they will often outwit the competition. The use of technology can play a crucial role in this.
The current economic conditions – limited economic growth, low interest rates and low oil prices – are favorable for consumer-related companies with above-average growth. The average expected earnings growth for the next three to five years for businesses in Robeco Global Consumer Trends Equities is 15-17%, which far exceeds the expected earnings growth for the market as a whole (8-10%). We expect that the above trends will continue in 2016 and that our investments in companies that are well positioned to benefit from them will once again bear fruit.
Confermo di essere un cliente professionale
Le informazioni e le opinioni contenute in questa sezione del Sito cui sta accedendo sono destinate esclusivamente a Clienti Professionali come definiti dal Regolamento Consob n. 16190 del 29 ottobre 2007 (articolo 26 e Allegato 3) e dalla Direttiva CE n. 2004/39 (Allegato II), e sono concepite ad uso esclusivo di tali categorie di soggetti. Ne è vietata la divulgazione, anche solo parziale.
Al fine di accedere a tale sezione riservata, si prega di confermare di essere un Cliente Professionale, declinando Robeco qualsivoglia responsabilità in caso di accesso effettuato da una persona che non sia un cliente professionale.
In ogni caso, le informazioni e le opinioni ivi contenute non costituiscono un'offerta o una sollecitazione all'investimento e non costituiscono una raccomandazione o consiglio, anche di carattere fiscale, o un'offerta, finalizzate all'investimento, e non devono in alcun caso essere interpretate come tali.
Prima di ogni investimento, per una descrizione dettagliata delle caratteristiche, dei rischi e degli oneri connessi, si raccomanda di esaminare il Prospetto, i KIIDs delle classi autorizzate per la commercializzazione in Italia, la relazione annuale o semestrale e lo Statuto, disponibili sul presente Sito o presso i collocatori.
L’investimento in prodotti finanziari è soggetto a fluttuazioni, con conseguente variazione al rialzo o al ribasso dei prezzi, ed è possibile che non si riesca a recuperare l'importo originariamente investito.