The energy crisis unfolding across the globe is rocking energy markets and impacting households, firms and investors. For now, electricity prices in Europe have been the most seriously affected, but the problem is not exclusively a European one and price hikes could easily spread to other regions.
Forward curves are pointing towards persistently elevated power prices in the coming years
Some of the crisis’ causes, notably explosive demand due to economic re-openings, are cyclical and will eventually fade. Overall, however, price volatility is here to stay. This, combined with tightening regulation and net zero initiatives, present excellent opportunities for investments across the clean energy value chain.
The last quarter of 2021 saw a convergence of external forces that have unleashed a wave of volatility across the energy sector. Starting in Europe, spiking electricity prices have wreaked havoc on energy systems across the continent. Simultaneously, higher energy prices in the form of gas, oil and coal, have added fuel to the fire. Even more troubling, forward curves are pointing towards persistently elevated power prices in the coming years.
Numerous factors are to blame. While demand has been stronger than expected, the issue is mainly one of supply. Energy reserves are at unprecedented lows after weak wind conditions decreased wind energy output and lower rainfall reduced capacity at critical hydropower stations. Moreover, replenishment via imports from the US and Russia, Europe’s traditional trading partners, have also failed to materialize amidst international competition and geopolitical gaming.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) which entered into force in 2020, has had the intended consequence of raising carbon prices, thus making it more expensive for heavy-carbon producers like coal and gas. The price of carbon certificates has already reached unprecedented levels (EUR 90 as at 8 December 2021) and have nowhere to go but up given shrinking carbon certificates, COP26 pledges and supportive energy prices. Although supply shortages have remained the main force at play, we believe carbon has accounted for about 10-20% of the recent spike in electricity prices.
Analyzing publicly available electricity consumption data from companies’ sustainability reports1 we calculate that electricity costs (assuming EUR50/MWh) represent on average 0.4% of revenue. From a purely theoretical perspective, assuming electricity costs double, ceteris paribus, the impact on profitability would be roughly 2.8% (0.4% higher costs on average EBITDA margin of 15%), with most energy intensive sectors such as Materials2 being hit the most (impact >10%). Industrials, Consumer Discretionary (which includes car makers) and Information Technology (which includes semiconductor companies) being relatively less energy intensive3, would suffer a smaller impact on profitability (1%-2.5%).
In order to counteract the negative effects of higher energy prices, companies can establish hedging policies, structure long-term supply contracts or set commercial relationships where prices are adjusted to reference raw material prices. However, the key action to defend profitability is to pass on higher energy costs to customers. This normally happens with time lags depending on operating frameworks and competitive environment.
Companies with higher pricing power, will be able to raise selling prices to pass through higher energy prices. Conversely, lower pricing power in highly competitive landscapes not only means inability to translate higher costs into higher selling prices, but also a greater negative relative impact of energy prices on profit margins.
Companies with higher pricing power will be able to raise selling prices to pass through higher energy prices
Wind and solar equipment suppliers and component manufacturers are a case in point for highly competitive markets. Commodity shortages and increased demand for steel, aluminum and polysilicon have created inflationary pressure on the raw materials required for renewable energy installations, pushing prices up. Ballooning shipping costs and deliver delays have exacerbated the problem by reducing production inventories and pressuring supplier margins.
While public sector mechanisms still need to smooth the impact on vulnerable sectors of society, we believe the impact of higher power prices will be absorbed by the energy system. This should serve as a wakeup call for companies to avoid energy volatility and accelerate the shift to renewable energy sources. Around a third of the MSCI World’s constituents provide renewable consumption data; on average 18% of energy used in 2020 was from renewable sources. Financial service companies performed best with more than 60% renewable energy while Industrial companies ranked well below average with only 11% of renewables in their energy mix.
Further fears over power cuts or break-ups of contracts from utility suppliers, will boost investments in energy storage solutions such as battery and green hydrogen. These will also help to overcome renewables’ intermittency issues and ensure reliable energy supply always matches demand. This creates an even stronger incentive for corporates to reduce future risks by investing in cleaner energy sources and more energy-efficient devices. We are already seeing corporates backward integrating into renewable generation rather than just securing renewable energy through long-term power purchase agreements. As renewable capacity ramps up, costs will continue to fall, making it cost competitive with traditional energy sources whose prices will continue to rise.
Higher energy prices provide strong tailwinds for our sustainable thematic strategies which aim to decarbonize energy and manufacturing activities. The businesses in which we invest offer a unique value proposition that is driven by addressing the need for energy efficiency. As a result, they should enjoy higher demand and growth rates in the future.
1Out of 1,555 of the MSCI World’s constituents, more than half provide energy-use data for fiscal year 2020.
2Given an average energy intensity of ca 500MWh per million of Euro revenue.
3Given an average energy intensity of ca 50-60MWh per million of Euro revenue.
4The graphic depicts the historical mean levelized cost of energy (LCOE) values of energy sources over more than a decade. Solar power costs have fallen dramatically over the past decade and are now lower than, natural gas, the cheapest fossil fuel. The LCOE of a given technology is the ratio of lifetime costs to lifetime electricity generation, both of which are discounted back to a common year using a discount rate that reflects the average cost of capital.
The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Hong Kong. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice. This document has been distributed by Robeco Hong Kong Limited (‘Robeco’). Robeco is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong.
This document has been prepared on a confidential basis solely for the recipient and is for information purposes only. Any reproduction or distribution of this documentation, in whole or in part, or the disclosure of its contents, without the prior written consent of Robeco, is prohibited. By accepting this documentation, the recipient agrees to the foregoing
This document is intended to provide the reader with information on Robeco’s specific capabilities, but does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell certain securities or investment products. Investment decisions should only be based on the relevant prospectus and on thorough financial, fiscal and legal advice.
The contents of this document are based upon sources of information believed to be reliable. This document is not intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
Investment Involves risks. Historical returns are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect Robeco’s expectations for the future. The value of your investments may fluctuate. Past performance is no indication of current or future performance.
此網站由Robeco Hong Kong Limited（「荷寶」）擬備及刊發，荷寶是獲香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會發牌從事第1類（證券交易）、第4類（就證券提供意見）及第9類（資產管理）受規管活動的企業。荷寶不持有客戶資產,並受到發牌條件所規限。荷寶在擴展至零售業務之前,必須先得到證監會的批准。本網頁未經證券及期貨事務監察委員會或香港的任何監管當局審閱。
Robeco Capital Growth Funds以其特定的投資政策或其他特徵作識別，請小心閱讀有關Robeco Capital Growth Funds的風險：
荷寶保證將會根據現行的資料保障法例，以保密方式處理登入此網站的人士的數據。除非荷寶需按法律責任行事，否則在未經登入此網站的人士許可，不會向第三方提供該等數據。 請於我們的私隱及Cookie政策 中查找更多詳情。