The information contained in the website is solely intended for professional investors. Some funds shown on this website fall outside the scope of the Dutch Act on the Financial Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).
The funds shown on this website may not be available in your country. Please select your country website (top right corner) to view the products that are available in your country.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website and at the Robeco offices in each country where Robeco has a presence.
Previous studies have shown that the value added by fundamental indexation strategies is entirely driven by their implicit exposure to the classic value premium. This article* compares fundamental index strategies with strategies that start with the market index and then tilt towards value stocks.
The authors find that the tilted strategies involve similar returns, volatility and turnover to the corresponding fundamental index, but that they have higher information ratios and lower tracking error. Using the same methodology, they go on to show that a modified index strategy that incorporates multiple distinct quantitative factors generates much higher information ratios than the fundamental index strategy, with similar turnover.
We agree with the conclusions of this study: fundamental indexation is a value strategy that is designed for its simplicity and appeal, but it is not the most efficient way of capturing the value premium.