The information contained in the website is solely intended for professional investors. Some funds shown on this website fall outside the scope of the Dutch Act on the Financial Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht) and therefore do not (need to) have a license from the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).
The funds shown on this website may not be available in your country. Please select your country website (top right corner) to view the products that are available in your country.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website and at the Robeco offices in each country where Robeco has a presence.
A paper* compares the performance of low-volatility portfolios constructed by using a ranking methodology versus portfolios constructed with mean/variance optimization. The idea behind ranking is to simply buy a basket of the lowest-volatility stocks, while optimization involves sophisticated algorithms and risk models.
The paper concludes that both approaches are equally effective in reducing portfolio volatility over a long-term investment horizon. When we investigated this issue, we found similar results, but also that ranking offers various advantages, such as increased transparency of the investment process. Based on this, we decided to adopt a ranking approach for our low-volatility Conservative Equities strategies.
Our researchers publish many whitepapers based on their own empirical studies; they also follow quantitative research done by others. Head of Quant Equities Research David Blitz comments on notable external papers.