Robeco Financial Institutions Bonds IH USD
- Diversified exposure to subordinated financial bonds
- Disciplined and repeatable investment process
- No active duration, nor FX exposure
About this fund
Price development
Performance
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.date,'llll') ]}}| Fund | Reference index | |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | ||
| 3m | ||
| YTD | ||
| 1 year | ||
| 2 years | ||
| 3 years | ||
| 5 years | ||
| 10 years | ||
| {{'fund.detail.performance.period.sinceInception' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.sinceStart.startDate,'MM-YYYY') ]}} |
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
| Fund | Reference index | |
|---|---|---|
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
Performance explanation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}Based on transaction prices, the fund's return was -1.38%. The portfolio posted a negative return in November, which was worse than the index return. The average credit spread of the index widened from 233 basis points to 270 basis points during the month, contributing negatively to the return of the portfolio. The index spread is now back at the level that was last seen in July 2016. Underlying government bond yields declined during the month, benefiting the portfolio’s return. The beta of the portfolio was higher than one, implying that the top-down positioning contributed negatively to the performance of the portfolio. The impact of issuer selection to the relative performance was close to neutral. Bonds that performed fairly well in the portfolio were Tier 2 bonds issued by banks with low-risk lending books. Examples here are Argenta (Belgian and Dutch mortgages), Nykredit (Danish mortgages) and DBS Bank from Singapore. UK banks performed poorly, the portfolio was negatively impacted by the overweight in Nationwide. Sabadell Tier 2 bonds widened significantly after the bank issued a new Tier 2 bond at a very attractive spread. We have seen more examples lately of very cheap primary deals resetting the spreads of existing bonds.
Statistics
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate( (fund.fundStatistics.date?fund.fundStatistics.date:fund.fundCharacteristics.date) ,'llll') ]}}| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation |
|
||
| Max. monthly gain (%) |
|
||
| Tracking error ex-post (%) |
|
||
| Alpha | |||
| Beta |
|
||
| Sharpe ratio | |||
| Information ratio | |||
| Max. monthly loss (%) |
|
| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit ratio (%) | |||
| Hit ratio Bear (%) | |||
| Hit ratio Bull (%) | |||
| Months Bear market | |||
| Months Bull market | |||
| Months outperformance | |||
| Months outperformance Bear | |||
| Months outperformance Bull |
| Fund | Reference index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Option Adjusted Modified Duration (years) | |||
| Maturity (years) | |||
| Rating | |||
| Yield to Worst (%) |
Market development
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}Risky assets had a rough ride again in November and subordinated bonds of banks and insurance companies were no exception. While spreads tightened in the first week of the month, this was followed by significant spread widening in the weeks thereafter. Investors are becoming more concerned about the economic outlook, as economic data in Europe is surprising negatively and momentum in the US seems to be slowing down too. Worries around Brexit increased, as the political situation within the Conservative government turned out to be very volatile. UK banks suffered significantly in this period, with Barclays and RBS being the worst performers. Another volatile part of the market was Italy. The yield differential between Italian government bonds and German Bunds peaked at circa 3.25% on 20 November. Since then, Italian BTPs have outperformed German Bunds. It seems that the Italian government is willing to make adjustments to its 2019 budget after all, which is taken positively by the market. Italy issued a new bond targeted at retail investors, but appetite for this bond disappointed. This might be one of the reasons for the change in tone of the populist government.
Fund allocation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundAllocations.date,'llll') ]}}| Name | Sector | Weight |
|---|---|---|
Fund Classification
| Yes | No | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting | ||||
| Engagement | ||||
| ESG integration | ||||
| Exclusion |
| Yes | No | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screening | ||||
| Integration | ||||
| Sustainability Themed Fund |
Currency policy
All currency risks are hedged.
Derivative policy
Robeco Financial Institutions Bonds fund make use of derivatives for hedging purposes as well as for investment purposes. These derivatives are very liquid.
Dividend policy
This share class of the fund does not distribute dividend.
ESG Integration policy
The prime goal of integrating ESG factors in our analysis is to strengthen our ability to assess the downside risk of our credit investments. Our analysts include RobecoSAM sustainability data and use external sources to make an ESG assessment as a part of the fundamental analysis.
Investment policy
Robeco Financial Institutions Bonds mainly invests in subordinated euro-denominated bonds issued by financial institutions. The fund offers a diversified exposure across 50-60 issuers, including the new style hybrid bonds that are being issued on the back of Basel III regulation. Focus of the fund are higher rated bonds (investment grade) with a tilt to Tier 2 bonds. The fund aims to outperform its index Barclays Euro-Aggregate: Corporates Financials Subordinated 2% Issuer Cap. The index applies an issuer cap to avoid concentration risk. The investment philosophy is based on managing a solid diversified portfolio with a long term view. Top-down beta positioning is based on the outcome of our credit quarterly outlook meeting, in which the team is discussing the fundamental market outlook, valuation of bond markets and market technicals. Bottom-up issuer research is executed by our credit analysts, who execute the fundamental analysis. The portfolio managers are responsible for the portfolio construction. A proprietary developed risk management approach avoids high risk concentration in the portfolio. As the investment process is well-structured and proven over time, it contributes to repeatable performance delivery. Duration of the portfolio is managed in line with the index and currency exposure is hedged.
Risk policy
Risk management is fully embedded in the investment process to ensure that positions always meet predefined guidelines.
Expectation of fund manager
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}In the past month, spreads have widened significantly, reaching higher levels than the trading range we saw since the start of the summer. In fact, spreads are now trading in the range that we last saw in the first half of 2016. At that time, markets were worried about a global slowdown in economic growth. For the financial sector specifically, markets worried about the credit risk of Deutsche Bank and about the fact that coupon payments on AT1 CoCos could be at risk. To some extent, we are seeing similar worries right now. Economic growth is slowing down and the market is currently reassessing the risk of callable bonds being extended after the first call date. We would argue that a large part of the increased risks is priced in by the market. Bonds with low reset spreads have widened significantly and are trading at cheap levels now. Brexit, Italy and conduct charges are risks facing the financial sector, but the companies involved have seen a significant repricing already. We are not concerned about the fundamental credit quality of the sector. The significant deleveraging that took place over the past years means that the sector is well equipped to face lower economic growth.
Jan Willem de Moor
Mr. de Moor is a Senior Portfolio Manager and a member of the Credit team. Prior to joining Robeco in 2005, Mr. de Moor was employed by SBA Artsenpensioenfondsen as Senior Portfolio Manager Equities for six years. Before that, he worked at SNS Asset Management holding positions of Portfolio Manager Equities (three years) and Research Analyst (two years). Jan Willem de Moor started his career in the Investment Industry in 1994. He holds a Master's degree in Economics from Tilburg University.
Team
The Robeco Financial Institutions Bonds fund is managed within Robeco’s credit team, which consists of nine portfolio managers and twenty-three credit analysts (of which four financials analysts). The portfolio managers are responsible for the construction and management of the credit portfolios, whereas the analysts cover the team’s fundamental research. Our analysts have long term experience in their respective sectors which they cover globally. Each analyst covers both investment grade and high yield, providing them an information advantage and benefiting from inefficiencies that traditionally exist between the two segmented markets. Furthermore, the credit team is supported by dedicated quantitative researchers and fixed income traders. On average, the members of the credit team have an experience in the asset management industry of seventeen years, of which eight years with Robeco.
Details
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}| Management company | |
| Fund capital | |
| Size of share class | |
| Outstanding shares | |
| ISIN | LU1117477098 |
| Bloomberg | RFIBIHU LX |
| Valoren | 25594216 |
| WKN | A2AQQV |
| Availability | |
| 1st quotation date | 1412726400000 |
| Close financial year | 31-12 |
| Legal status | |
| Tracking error limit (%) | |
| Reference index |
Cost of this fund
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundCosts.managementFees.date,'llll') ]}}Ongoing charges |
|
|---|---|
| This fund deducts ongoing charges of |
| These charges comprise | ||
|---|---|---|
| Management fee | ||
| Service fee | ||
Transaction costs |
|
|---|---|
| The expected transaction costs are |
Performance fee |
|
|---|---|
| This fund may also deduct a performance fee of |
Extra fees
| max entry fee | ||
| Max exit fee | ||
| Max sub fee | ||
| Max switch fee |
Fiscal product treatment
The fund is established in Luxembourg and is subject to the Luxembourg tax laws and regulations. The fund is not liable to pay any corporation, income, dividend or capital gains tax in Luxembourg. The fund is subject to an annual subscription tax ('tax d'abonnement') in Luxembourg, which amounts to 0.01% of the net asset value of the fund. This tax is included in the net asset value of the fund. The fund can in principle use the Luxembourg treaty network to partially recover any withholding tax on its income.
Fiscal treatment of investor
Investors who are not subject to (exempt from) Dutch corporate-income tax (e.g. pension funds) are not taxed on the achieved result. Investors who are subject to Dutch corporate-income tax can be taxed for the result achieved on their investment in the fund. Dutch bodies that are subject to corporate-income tax are obligated to declare interest and dividend income, as well as capital gains in their tax return. Investors residing outside the Netherlands are subject to their respective national tax regime applying to foreign investment funds. We advise individual investors to consult their financial or tax adviser about the tax consequences of an investment in this fund in their specific circumstances before deciding to invest in the fund.
