The content displayed on this website is exclusively directed at qualified investors, as defined in the swiss collective investment schemes act of 23 june 2006 ("cisa") and its implementing ordinance, or at “independent asset managers” which meet additional requirements as set out below. Qualified investors are in particular regulated financial intermediaries such as banks, securities dealers, fund management companies and asset managers of collective investment schemes and central banks, regulated insurance companies, public entities and retirement benefits institutions with professional treasury or companies with professional treasury.
The contents, however, are not intended for non-qualified investors. By clicking "I agree" below, you confirm and acknowledge that you act in your capacity as qualified investor pursuant to CISA or as an “independent asset manager” who meets the additional requirements set out hereafter. In the event that you are an "independent asset manager" who meets all the requirements set out in Art. 3 para. 2 let. c) CISA in conjunction with Art. 3 CISO, by clicking "I Agree" below you confirm that you will use the content of this website only for those of your clients which are qualified investors pursuant to CISA.
Representative in Switzerland of the foreign funds registered with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority ("FINMA") for distribution in or from Switzerland to non-qualified investors is Robeco Switzerland AG, Josefstrasse 218, 8005 Zürich, and the paying agent is UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zürich. Please consult www.finma.ch for a list of FINMA registered funds.
Neither information nor any opinion expressed on the website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco/Robeco Switzerland product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as management regulations, articles of association, prospectuses, key investor information documents and annual and semi-annual reports, which can be all be obtained free of charge at this website, at the registered seat of the representative in Switzerland, as well as at the Robeco/Robeco Switzerland offices in each country where Robeco has a presence. In respect of the funds distributed in Switzerland, the place of performance and jurisdiction is the registered office of the representative in Switzerland.
This website is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where, by reason of that person's nationality, residence or otherwise, the publication or availability of this website is prohibited. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access this website.
The numbers of groups of people that have a sustainability focus has grown tremendously over the years, and the topic is not going away anymore. That is pretty clear to me. All asset managers have built teams to conduct voting and engagement and feed ESG information into the investment teams. Brokerage houses have also started producing vast amounts of ESG research. This is really new to me – and clearly is a big step ahead!
What seems to remain the same is that this information – while widely distributed – is still mostly read by me (as an ESG specialist) and some of the other sustainability specialists. Topics are wide-ranging and plentiful. We read a lot about investment opportunities arising from the 2-degree scenario for climate change, corporate governance in Asia, and the top five sustainability trends for 2017. Yet it mainly remains isolated from ‘normal’ fundamental analysis.
Indeed, I could not help but notice that this top-down ESG research is still hardly being read by ’mainstream’ financial analysts. That is quite understandable considering the fact that their raison d’etre is to make a good return for their clients. If they do not, they lose clients and eventually their jobs. Furthermore, as most analysts focus on a specific sector or industry, ESG overview papers are too general for them. Thirdly, financial analysts can only spend their (research) time once, and their priority often goes into what is immediately financially relevant. ESG information gets lost in the vast excess of information that is being thrown at them.
Don’t get me wrong: it is extremely important that this ESG research is produced, and there cannot be enough champions on ESG within the financial industry. But for ESG research to really do its job, it should not be performed in isolation from ‘mainstream’ fundamental analysis.
At Robeco, ESG is integrated into the main investment processes of equity and fixed income. While the initial ESG analysis is done by a dedicated internal sustainability analyst, the financial analyst brings it all together to make one comprehensive decision. A brief round of inquiry at the Global Equity team shows that in order for the team to be able to do this properly, the single most important factor is having access to relevant research. And relevance means there needs to be a link to financial performance; it needs to be tailored to the investment process, and the markets need not be pricing in this information already. Such company-specific research is highly differentiated, and so it often brings unique information to the surface that gives us further conviction in our investment decision.
Being close to the sustainability research analysts makes it possible for the financial analysts at Robeco to receive research that is tailor-made to their investment needs. From the sell side (brokers), we are also seeing some more relevant research being produced, where KeplerCheuvreux is adding ESG research to company reports, and Morgan Stanley is producing sector reports ranking companies on material ESG topics. For European banks Morgan Stanley closely look at corporate governance (and executive compensation), human capital, business conduct and cyber security, while for European medical technology companies their focus is on corporate governance, data privacy and tracking, environmental standards and patient safety aspects.
True integration would mean more and more of this kind of information being published in the standard company reports, and these topics would make the earnings calls of companies. I am looking forward to seeing more of this, as I am convinced that this would give analysts more conviction on what is behind the numbers, and would help us make better-informed investment decisions. That would really be making progress.