Robeco High Yield Bonds CH USD
- Managed with a conservative approach
- Disciplined and repeatable investment process
- Experienced team management
About this fund
Price development
Performance
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.date,'llll') ]}}| Fund | Reference index | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | ||
| 3 months | ||
| YTD | ||
| 1 year | ||
| 2 years | ||
| 3 years | ||
| 5 years | ||
| 10 years | ||
| {{'fund.detail.performance.period.sinceInception' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundPerformances.sinceStart.startDate,'MM-YYYY') ]}} |
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
| Fund | Reference index | |
|---|---|---|
Annualized (for periods longer than one year).
Cumulized (total amount of return).
Performances are gross of fees and based on closing values. In reality, costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown.
Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.
Performance explanation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}Based on transaction prices, the fund's return was 0.39%. The global high yield index delivered a total return of around 0.5% in October. During the month spreads tightened 5 bps; underlying government bonds widened a few bps. The fund recorded a small outperformance. Our cautious beta positioning made a minor negative performance contribution of around -9 bps. Our preference for euro high yield at the expense of US high yield also made a small negative contribution this month. Our quality bias made a positive contribution, as BBs outperformed CCCs on a risk-adjusted basis. At the sector level, energy was again the weakest sector for the month – we have benefited from being underweight. On an issuer level, we added 4 bps by not owning PBF Energy. This US refiner plunged from high 70s to low 40s during the month. Weakness in oil also impacted Occidental Petroleum, where we are underweight. This added 4 bps for the month. Our exposure in the secured bonds of Transocean detracted 4 bps from our relative performance as well. The company tendered for some bonds at an average cash price of 61cts, but is still facing headwinds from E&P companies cutting down their capital expenditures.
Statistics
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate( (fund.fundStatistics.date?fund.fundStatistics.date:fund.fundCharacteristics.date) ,'llll') ]}}| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tracking error ex-post (%) |
|
||
| Information ratio | |||
| Sharpe ratio | |||
| Alpha (%) | |||
| Beta |
|
||
| Standard deviation |
|
||
| Max. monthly gain (%) |
|
||
| Max. monthly loss (%) |
|
| 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Months outperformance | |||
| Hit ratio (%) | |||
| Months Bull market | |||
| Months outperformance Bull | |||
| Hit ratio Bull (%) | |||
| Months Bear market | |||
| Months outperformance Bear | |||
| Hit ratio Bear (%) |
| Fund | Reference index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | |||
| Option Adjusted Modified Duration (years) | |||
| Maturity (years) | |||
| Yield to Worst (%) | |||
| Green Bonds (%) |
Dividend paying history
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}| Date | Amount |
|---|---|
Market development
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundInvestmentExplanations.date,'llll') ]}}The global high yield market started off strong in October, but came under some pressure towards month-end, resulting in a total return of around 0.5%. The month started with bond prices rallying on the back of hopes for a vaccine and expectations of another large US stimulus bill. As October progressed, the number of infections rose quickly in Europe, which led to tougher restrictions and lockdowns. Uncertainty regarding the US elections weighed on investor sentiment and spreads started to trend wider. Oil prices also reacted heavily and moved down 10%. Gross monthly high yield issuance decreased compared to previous months and in the end USD 34 billion of new deals entered the index. Mallinckrodt and Gulfport Energy defaulted in October, affecting USD 1.8 billion of debt. High yield reported strong inflows following outflows in September. The market demonstrated a wide dispersion in performance on a sector level, where industries that were heavily impacted by Covid-19, like transportation and retail, outperformed. Spreads finished the month 5 bps tighter at a level of 505 bps. The average yield to worst of the global high yield index ended the month at 5.47%.
Fund allocation
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundAllocations.date,'llll') ]}}| Name | Sector | Weight |
|---|---|---|
Fund Classification
| Yes | No | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting | ||||
| Engagement | ||||
| ESG integration | ||||
| Exclusion |
| Yes | No | N/A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screening | ||||
| Integration | ||||
| Sustainability Themed Fund |
Currency policy
All currency risks are hedged.
Derivative policy
Robeco High Yield Bonds make use of derivatives for hedging purposes as well as for investment purposes. These derivatives are very liquid.
Dividend policy
The fund distributes dividend on a quarterly basis. This fund aims to pay a quarterly dividend of 1.5%. The dividends referred to are target dividends and may be subject to change as a result of market conditions.
ESG Integration policy
Our analysis of issuers goes beyond the traditional financial factors and includes the issuers’ performance on ESG factors. We deem it essential for a well-informed investment decision to take into account those ESG factors that have the potential to materially impact the financial performance of the issuer. This perfectly matches the basic need to avoid the losers in credit management, as many credit events in the past can be attributed to issues such as poorly designed governance frameworks, environmental issues, or weak health & safety standards. The aim of ESG integration is to improve the risk/return profile of the investments and does not have an impact goal. ESG analysis is fully integrated in the bottom-up security analysis. We have defined key ESG factors per industry, and for every company we analyze how the firm is positioned versus these key ESG factors, and how this impacts the fundamental credit quality.
Investment policy
Robeco High Yield Bonds invests in corporate bonds with a sub-investment grade rating, issued primarily by US and European issuers. The portfolio is broadly diversified with a structural bias to the higher rated part in high yield (BB/B). Performance drivers are the top-down beta positioning as well as bottom-up issuer selection. The fund aims to outperform its index Barclays US Corporate High Yield & Pan European High Yield ex Financials, 2.5% Issuer Cap. The index applies an issuer cap to avoid concentration risk. The investment philosophy is based on managing a solid diversified portfolio with a long term view. Top-down beta positioning is based on the outcome of our credit quarterly outlook meeting, in which the team discusses and defines the fundamental market outlook, valuation of bond markets and market technicals. Bottom-up issuer research is executed by our credit analysts, who execute the fundamental analysis. The portfolio managers are responsible for the portfolio construction. A proprietary developed risk management approach avoids high risk concentration in the portfolio. Holdings in equities can only appear in the portfolio as a result of corporate actions and/or debt restructuring. It is not the intention of the portfolio manager to use options or swaptions. As the investment process is well-structured and proven over time, it contributes to repeatable performance delivery. Duration of the portfolio is managed in line with the index.
Risk policy
Risk management is fully embedded in the investment process to ensure that positions always meet predefined guidelines.
Expectation of fund manager
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}We are still in the midst of the largest global health crisis seen in a century. The world awaits a vaccine that will enable us to return to our normal lives. The market has already received its shot, though, in the form of unprecedented monetary and fiscal support for the private sector. Do fundamentals still matter in an environment where the central bank ‘put’ has overwhelmed everything else? Longer term, we have no doubt that fundamentals still matter. After the initial shock, macro data in Q3 surprised to the upside compared to very downbeat expectations. This has helped risk markets. But the momentum of the recovery is clearly fading now and positive surprises have ceased. For the market as a whole, we judge valuations as being stretched. Spread levels are at or below the long-term average for all segments of the market. Systemic risk is suppressed by central banks, idiosyncratic risk certainly is not! At the moment our beta is already below one – and we keep it there. We are convinced that there will be opportunities to add or reduce risk in the coming months. There is still a lot of volatility in Covid-sensitive sectors, which from time to time offer good value.
Sander Bus, Roeland Moraal
Mr. Bus is Head of the Credit team and manages our high yield portfolios. Prior to joining Robeco in 1998, Mr. Bus worked for Rabobank as a fixed income analyst for two years. Mr. Bus holds a Master's degree in Financial Economics from Erasmus University, Rotterdam. He became a CFA charter holder in 2003 and is registered with the Dutch Securities Institute. Mr. Bus has been active in the industry since 1996. Mr. Roeland Moraal, Vice President, CEFA, Portfolio Manager. Roeland is a Senior Portfolio Manager High Yield within Robeco's Credit team since January 2004. Before assuming this role, he was portfolio manager in our Rates team for two years and worked as an analyst with the Institute for Research and Investment Services for three years. Roeland started his career in the investment industry in 1997 at Robeco. He holds a Master's degree in applied mathematics from the University of Twente and a Master's degree in Law from Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Roeland became a CEFA charter holder in 2000 and he is registered with the Dutch Securities Institute.
Team
The Robeco High Yield fund is managed within Robeco’s credit team, which consists of nine portfolio managers and twenty-three credit analysts. The portfolio managers are responsible for the construction and management of the credit portfolios, whereas the analysts cover the team’s fundamental research. Our analysts have long term experience in their respective sectors which they cover globally. Each analyst covers both investment grade and high yield, providing them an information advantage and benefiting from inefficiencies that traditionally exist between the two segmented markets. Furthermore, the credit team is supported by three dedicated quantitative researchers and four fixed income traders. On average, the members of the credit team have an experience in the asset management industry of seventeen years, of which eight years with Robeco.
Details
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundFacts.date,'llll') ]}}| Management company | |
| Fund capital | |
| Size of share class | |
| Outstanding shares | |
| ISIN | LU1618351966 |
| Bloomberg | RHYBCHU LX |
| Valoren | 36852504 |
| WKN | |
| Availability | |
| 1st quotation date | 1495065600000 |
| Close financial year | 31-12 |
| Legal status | |
| Tracking error limit (%) | |
| Morningstar |
|
| Reference index |
Cost of this fund
{{'fund.detail.general.perDate' | labelize:[ fundDate(fund.fundCosts.managementFees.date,'llll') ]}}Ongoing charges |
|
|---|---|
| This fund deducts ongoing charges of |
| These charges comprise | ||
|---|---|---|
| Management fee | ||
| Service fee | ||
Transaction costs |
|
|---|---|
| The expected transaction costs are |
Performance fee |
|
|---|---|
| This fund may also deduct a performance fee of |
Extra fees
| max entry fee | ||
| Max exit fee | ||
| Max sub fee | ||
| Max switch fee |
Fiscal product treatment
The fund is established in Luxembourg and is subject to the Luxembourg tax laws and regulations. The fund is not liable to pay any corporation, income, dividend or capital gains tax in Luxembourg. The fund is subject to an annual subscription tax ('tax d'abonnement') in Luxembourg, which amounts to 0.05% of the net asset value of the fund. This tax is included in the net asset value of the fund. The fund can in principle use the Luxembourg treaty network to partially recover any withholding tax on its income.
Fiscal treatment of investor
For private taxpayers in the Netherlands their assets in the fund belong in box 3. Investors pay on balance 1.2% investment yield tax per year on their average nets assets in box 3. The above is based on current fiscal legislation in the Netherlands. Shareholders are advised to consult their tax adviser regarding their own specific circumstances. In the Netherlands 25% dividend tax is deducted on cash dividends for all shareholders (regardless of where the shares are held). Shareholders who are not liable to pay tax in the Netherlands and are living in countries with a Double Tax Relief Treaty with the Netherlands may, depending on the treaty, re-claim a part of the dividend tax from the Dutch fiscal authorities. For fiscal questions we advise individual investors to contact their service channel or fiscal adviser.
