Disclaimer

BY CLICKING ON “I AGREE”, I DECLARE I AM A WHOLESALE CLIENT AS DEFINED IN THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001.

What is a Wholesale Client?
A person or entity is a “wholesale client” if they satisfy the requirements of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This commonly includes a person or entity:

  • who holds an Australian Financial Services License
  • who has or controls at least $10 million (and may include funds held by an associate or under a trust that the person manages)
  • that is a body regulated by APRA other than a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund;
    (ii) an approved deposit fund;
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme.
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
  • that is a body registered under the Financial Corporations Act 1974.
  • that is a trustee of:
    (i) a superannuation fund; or
    (ii) an approved deposit fund; or
    (iii) a pooled superannuation trust; or
    (iv) a public sector superannuation scheme
    within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the fund, trust or scheme has net assets of at least $10 million.
  • that is a listed entity or a related body corporate of a listed entity
  • that is an exempt public authority
  • that is a body corporate, or an unincorporated body, that:
    (i) carries on a business of investment in financial products, interests in land or other investments; and
    (ii) for those purposes, invests funds received (directly or indirectly) following an offer or invitation to the public, within the meaning of section 82 of the Corporations Act 2001, the terms of which provided for the funds subscribed to be invested for those purposes.
  • that is a foreign entity which, if established or incorporated in Australia, would be covered by one of the preceding paragraphs.
I Disagree
Operating performance and the low-volatility anomaly

Operating performance and the low-volatility anomaly

16-09-2015 | From the field

A paper* confirms that low-volatility stocks earn higher returns than high-volatility stocks in equity markets around the globe, a finding which is consistent with our own work in this area. The authors then go on to argue that an explanation for this anomaly is the superior operating performance of low-volatility stocks.

  • David Blitz
    David
    Blitz
    PhD, Executive Director, Head of Quant Selection Research

However, we wonder whether this is really an explanation, or basically a rephrasing of the question, as it just replaces the puzzle of why the market misprices low-volatility stocks by the puzzle why the market fails to foresee their superior operating performance. In fact, it would probably be more puzzling if low-volatility stocks would have high returns without strong operating performance, as that would imply that low-volatility stocks only do well because their valuations go up, which would indicate that the anomaly is actually a kind of value effect.

Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Stay informed on Quant investing with monthly mail updates
Subscribe
From the field
From the field

Our researchers publish many whitepapers based on their own empirical studies; they also follow quantitative research done by others.

Read all articles
Subjects related to this article are: