By continuing on this site you have agreed to cookies being placed and accessed by this website. More information and adjusting cookie settings.

Robeco uses cookies to analyze your visit to this site, to share information via social media and to personalize the site and advertisements in line with your own preferences. By clicking on agree or by continuing on this site, you agree to the above. More information and adjusting cookie settings.

AGREE

Robeco uses cookies to analyze your visit to this site, to share information via social media and to personalize the site and advertisements in line with your own preferences. By clicking on agree or by continuing on this site, you agree to the above. More information and adjusting cookie settings.

AGREE

By continuing on this site you have agreed to cookies being placed and accessed by this website. More information and adjusting cookie settings.

On the nature and predictability of corporate bond returns

Abstract

16-05-2012 | Research | Daniël Haesen, CFA, Patrick Houweling, PhD Corporate bond returns consist of two distinct components: an interest rate component, which is default-free and anti-cyclical, and a credit spread component, which is default-risky and pro-cyclical. These components are mutually negatively correlated and their relative importance varies with credit quality. We show that it is of critical importance to take this into account when studying the predictability of corporate bond returns.

In this paper we focus on the credit spread component of corporate bond returns, enabling us to find new predictors that were previously unknown to the literature. Moreover, by re-examining previously documented predictors, we are able to dismiss several of them as irrelevant for credit spread returns and to explain inconsistent findings between investment grade and high yield corporate bonds. In total, we find four factors with significant in-sample and out-of-sample predictability of both investment grade and high yield excess returns over Treasury. Two variables come from the existing literature: past equity return and past corporate bond return. Evidence for the other two variables is new: change in implied equity volatility and the Halloween indicator.
Share this page:

Author

Daniël Haesen, CFA
Quantitative Researcher


Author

Patrick Houweling, PhD
Portfolio Manager, Senior Quantitative Researcher