By continuing on this site you have agreed to cookies being placed and accessed by this website. More information and adjusting cookie settings.

Robeco uses cookies to analyze your visit to this site, to share information via social media and to personalize the site and advertisements in line with your own preferences. By clicking on agree or by continuing on this site, you agree to the above. More information and adjusting cookie settings.

AGREE

Robeco uses cookies to analyze your visit to this site, to share information via social media and to personalize the site and advertisements in line with your own preferences. By clicking on agree or by continuing on this site, you agree to the above. More information and adjusting cookie settings.

AGREE

By continuing on this site you have agreed to cookies being placed and accessed by this website. More information and adjusting cookie settings.

Thirteen things that could move markets in 2016

13-01-2016 | Outlook | Lukas Daalder The annual predictions season officially kicked off the moment we tore the last page off our 2015 calendar. Anything from simply making future projections based on existing movements and trends to coming up with top-of-your-head ideas for ‘black swans’ – unexpected events that could have a major impact.

We gave Lukas Daalder, CIO Investment Solutions, thirteen potential scenarios and asked him how likely they are to occur. And, if they do, what their impact will be on the financial markets.

Still more volatility
“Of all the variables that play a role on the financial markets, volatility is strictly speaking the most difficult to predict. Its main characteristic is that it always picks up when you are not expecting it to. In the current scenario, there are a number of reasons why the high volatility of 2015 is likely to continue. Firstly, the divergence in the monetary policy of the major central banks (the Federal Reserve is tightening; the ECB and Bank of Japan are easing). There is also a lot of uncertainty about oil: is the low oil price purely a supply issue or are there also demand-related reasons? And then there’s the falling ISM Index in the US which has now dropped to below 50. That’s also a cause for concern. Of course, volatility doesn’t necessarily have to be negative. In volatile markets prices still generally move higher, and that is our base scenario for 2016.

‘Historically nine out of ten geopolitical conflicts are non-events from an investor’s perspective’

Escalation of the conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran
“This really is a serious conflict. But investors often overreact to geopolitical tensions. A year ago we had a conflict between Russia and Ukraine; it didn’t lead to a new world war. The tensions between Russia and Turkey haven’t escalated either. Historically the best strategy for investors is to ignore geopolitical conflicts because they always seem to be non-events from the markets’ perspective.”

Hard landing for the Chinese economy
“The slowdown in the Chinese economy has been underway for some time now and has lasted longer than anyone thought it would. The government is providing stimulus but economic growth is still declining. The official growth figure is around 7%, but unofficial estimates are nearer the 3-4% level. It is clear that the Chinese government is not just going to stand back and watch everything collapse. Of course there are limits to the extent to which an economy can be controlled; but if anyone can do it, it’s the Chinese.”

Trump for president
“You really can’t imagine it happening – but that’s what we thought six months ago and Donald Trump is still doing well in the opinion polls. He might even become the Republican candidate. But he won’t have much chance against Hillary Clinton. That said, US elections don’t have much impact on the markets, unless you believe in the presidential cycle, that is. In that case you shouldn’t hold equities in 2016, but 2017 and 2018 will be great years for stocks.”

‘There is more chance of a Brexit than of Trump becoming US president’

Brexit
“There is little chance of a Brexit, but it is still more likely than Trump becoming US president. As a result of the refugee problem, anti-EU sentiment is increasing in the United Kingdom. Many British people see the EU as an expensive, paper tiger. However one would expect good sense to prevail in the referendum. Recent polls show that the number of EU proponents is falling, but that they still form a clear majority.”

Strong euro
“Our base scenario is still for the US dollar to rise on the back of Fed rates hikes. There’s a risk that everyone expects this and is already positioned for it to happen. If US growth stagnates and the Fed decides not to raise interest rates further, it could lead to a short squeeze. At the moment we prefer European stocks to their US counterparts and that won’t change if the euro appreciates by a couple of percent.”
 
Further Fed rate hikes
“This seems likely and is our base scenario for 2016. Fed Chair Janet Yellen carefully prepared the ground for the first rate hike, which went off without a hitch as far as the markets were concerned. It remains to be seen whether the same will happen this year in the event of further rate hikes.”

ECB loses its grip on the market
“At the end of 2015, it became clear that ECB president Mario Draghi had overplayed his hand and he was publicly called to order by his fellow board members. Sentiment within the ECB seems to be less unanimously positive than we thought, which is worth bearing in mind. Overall things are not looking too bad in Europe and further easing is less likely than in Japan. The challenge lies in the fact that the effects of the policy will gradually weaken over time.”

Rally in technology stocks falters
“Imagination is running rife when it comes to technology stocks, certainly in the case of a few names. Expectations for Big Data, the Internet of Things and the Sharing Economy have all become exceedingly optimistic. You can’t project ahead using existing trends indefinitely. Of course we will witness major new developments, but there is a risk that to a large extent these are already priced in.”

Commodity prices rise after years of declines
“This would be nice and is quite feasible, but the question is within what timeframe. The conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran could push up oil prices, but that’s not something we want to happen. Production levels are still high while demand has not picked up significantly. A very strong recovery in the commodities market is not really on the cards.”
 
Refugee problems paralyze Europe
“You can see it happening. Sweden has ‘closed’ the border with Denmark, which has ‘closed’ the border with Germany. There seems to be no large-scale, clear strategy. The question is whether this will impact the markets. Perhaps it could, if all the dissatisfaction culminates in a Brexit.”

Defaults in the high yield market
“There is no doubt we’ll see more defaults. But as long as the US economy continues to grow, I don’t expect it to be a tidal wave. However, if economic growth ebbs away, we could see defaults occurring, which in turn make it more difficult for companies to borrow, creating a vicious circle. Looking at current corporate refinancing requirements, I don’t think this is a major threat for 2016 or 2017.”

Well, well, well. What have we here? – Inflation!
“An unexpected return of high levels of inflation would be the best example of a black swan. Only it’s difficult to see where this could happen. Perhaps as a result of a tight US labor market and rising wages in China, but these are both still a long way off. If inflation does re-emerge, it will be totally unexpected and the impact on the financial markets – particularly the bond market – will be huge.”
Lukas Daalder

Lukas Daalder

CIO Investment Solutions
Share this page:

Author

Lukas Daalder
CIO Investment Solutions


Join the conversation




Newsletter

Sign up for our email newsletter to receive updates and to stay informed about upcoming webinars.